-1 The mnemonic project created a new durable object model. There is no other similar models to replace it. I think it’s worth to continue and give it another chance to grow up. Thanks!
Best, Li On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Chenyang Li <[email protected]> wrote: > -1, still see some great value in this project, Gary’s point is valid. > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:42 PM Gary Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thank Craig for this vote call. > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote is -1, my 2 cents, because the JDK 9 and later have deprecated > the > > > > > > unsafe feature, that make the core functionalities hardly upgradable. but > > > > > > the JDK14 introduced a hybrid memory supporting feature recently, the new > > > > > > incubator feature looks provided the promising infrastructure for durable > > > > > > object model to migrate upon. I think it could be possible to bring dev. > > > > > > together. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 3:10 PM Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear members of the Mnemonic Community, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tl;dr please reply to this message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 retire the Mnemonic project > > > > > > > [ ] -1 do not retire the Mnemonic project because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting in touch with the Mnemonic community members in regard to > > > the > > > > > > > health of the project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There appears to be some work being done but almost all of the activity > > > in > > > > > > > the last several months is from just one person. The most recent board > > > > > > > report states that one PMC member left in August 2020 but I was unable > to > > > > > > > find any evidence of this event. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity > > > > > > > reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At > > > > > > > Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active > > > PMC > > > > > > > members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are usually > > > > > > > placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing > to > > > > > > > manage its releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, if your project has very low activity for good > reasons > > > > > > > and has at least three active PMC members willing to perform oversight, > > > it > > > > > > > can remain an Apache project so long as the Board is properly informed > > > and > > > > > > > the project remains open and welcoming to new contributors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There was a ROLL CALL last month to which only one PMC member > responded. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At this time, I am requesting a formal VOTE of the Apache Mnemonic > > > > > > > community. If you feel that this project is still viable, and able to > > > > > > > reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members, please respond > to > > > > > > > this message accordingly. If you are a member of the PMC but have moved > > > on > > > > > > > or are no longer able to participate, please tell us so that the > > > project's > > > > > > > status is clear. Failure to respond will indicate a lack of interest in > > > > > > > oversight. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please don't take this message as a criticism of the project or its > > > > > > > current chair. This is an expected event in the timeline of many open > > > > > > > source projects, and sometimes results in a renewed interest from the > > > > > > > development community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > Director, The Apache Software Foundation > > > > > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > < = > > > LESS IS MORE > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
