I'm also available today, thanks. On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 1:08 AM Kevin Ratnasekera <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am available within the day. Please reply if you are available to have > it today. > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 2:47 AM Gang(Gary) Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The following link might be useful for a meeting in weekend > > https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?pl=1&lid=30,8&h=8 > > > > I'm okay for a time slot at night, Thanks for scheduling > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:20 AM Kevin Ratnasekera < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Zhao, > >> > >> I will be able to allocate some time over the weekend, I am based in Sri > >> Lanka ( IST time ) so I am thinking whether it will work for others. > Just > >> let me know what works best for you/others. > >> > >> I second what Dave mentioned, these need discussed on public threads and > >> have some visibility over it. I have also noticed people replying to > this > >> email thread. Maybe we can encourage them to involve in these plans and > >> join them in contributing to the project. > >> > >> I also want to seek advice from the board as well, specifically on > moving > >> forward, since there are no 3 PMC members active to even elect a single > >> external contributor. I would like to know the board process to > >> reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members in cases such as > >> this. > >> > >> Regards > >> Kevin > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:55 AM Yanhui ZHAO <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Kevin and folks > >>> > >>> Do you have time for a sync meeting over the weekend to discuss project > >>> planning and roadmap? > >>> > >>> Considering people may live in different time zone so please share the > >>> time you prefer so that we can best coordinate. > >>> > >>> Thanks and talk to you soon! > >>> > >>> Yanhui > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> *From:* Kevin Ratnasekera <[email protected]> > >>> *Sent:* Sunday, October 4, 2020 2:03 PM > >>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] < > >>> [email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>> *Cc:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Mnemonic retirement > >>> > >>> Hi Folks, > >>> > >>> I have worked with Gang in the past, I have contributed to Apache > >>> Mnemonic during the past year. [1] I also noticed my contributions were > >>> recognized and proposed me as a committer to the project. [2] I was > also a > >>> bit discouraged by the lack of activity by Mnemonic PMC except Gang, I > >>> couldn't continue my usual contributions. > >>> > >>> -1 from my end, I would also like to see this project moving forward > >>> with a plan mentioned. Zhao, Gang I would like to volunteer, if you > need > >>> help from my end and couldn't find help from a 3rd member. > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/mnemonic/commits?author=djkevincr > >>> [2] > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/508a6710cd60320a8ffbc2035fd154cfbfa1fadc23320456afd11578%40%3Cprivate.mnemonic.apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Kevin > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:05 AM Yanhui ZHAO <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks, Craig > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> This is Yanhui Zhao and I am a PMC member. After last ROLL Call I have > >>> been connecting with Gang through weekly meetings regarding the > roadmap of > >>> Mnemonic for our next steps, and we are drafting some topics including > but > >>> not limited information below. After finalizing the priorities list we > will > >>> send it out for the community reviews. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> As we are moving forward we hope a third current PMC member to work > with > >>> us. If no current PMC volunteers, we hope to absorb new PMC member if > >>> possible to keep the project moving forward. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Please take this as my -1 vote with the reasoning above, thanks > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> BR > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Yanhui Zhao > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> === > >>> > >>> Project goal: > >>> > >>> To deliver a pre-product durable object model library working with > >>> persistent memory and high performance storage at the end of next year. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Project objectives > >>> > >>> 1) A stable and efficient CI system > >>> > >>> 2) A improved documentation and website > >>> > >>> 3) Integrated with Bytebuddy > >>> > >>> 4) Supporting JDK14 and leveraging the feature of non-volatile mapped > >>> byte buffers (incubator) > >>> > >>> 5) Adding Redis as one of backend of durable object > >>> > >>> 6) Verified code quality and testing > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Highlights key values of our project is (1) provide unified interface > >>> for storage(memory) backend, (2) remove se-des process to improve the > >>> access speed thus improving read/write performance > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Project Milestones > >>> > >>> 1) Dec. 2020, CI documentation and website (v0.14.0) > >>> > >>> 2) May. 2021, Bytebuddy and JDK14 (v0.15.0) > >>> > >>> 3) Oct. 2020, Redis backend and quality (v0.16.0) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Project Communication > >>> > >>> 1) Weekly regular meeting 30mins - 60 mins > >>> > >>> 2) Event based release meeting > >>> > >>> 3) Reporting meeting > >>> > >>> 4) Maillist, Jira, PR based discussion > >>> > >>> 5) Management meeting on demand > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> *From:* Craig Russell <[email protected]> > >>> *Sent:* Friday, October 2, 2020 3:10 PM > >>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>> *Cc:* Apache Board <[email protected]> > >>> *Subject:* [VOTE] Apache Mnemonic retirement > >>> > >>> Dear members of the Mnemonic Community, > >>> > >>> tl;dr please reply to this message. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 retire the Mnemonic project > >>> [ ] -1 do not retire the Mnemonic project because... > >>> > >>> I am getting in touch with the Mnemonic community members in regard to > >>> the health of the project. > >>> > >>> There appears to be some work being done but almost all of the activity > >>> in the last several months is from just one person. The most recent > board > >>> report states that one PMC member left in August 2020 but I was unable > to > >>> find any evidence of this event. > >>> > >>> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity > >>> reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At > >>> Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active > PMC > >>> members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are usually > >>> placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing > to > >>> manage its releases. > >>> > >>> On the other hand, if your project has very low activity for good > >>> reasons and has at least three active PMC members willing to perform > >>> oversight, it can remain an Apache project so long as the Board is > properly > >>> informed and the project remains open and welcoming to new > contributors. > >>> > >>> There was a ROLL CALL last month to which only one PMC member > responded. > >>> > >>> At this time, I am requesting a formal VOTE of the Apache Mnemonic > >>> community. If you feel that this project is still viable, and able to > >>> reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members, please respond > to > >>> this message accordingly. If you are a member of the PMC but have > moved on > >>> or are no longer able to participate, please tell us so that the > project's > >>> status is clear. Failure to respond will indicate a lack of interest in > >>> oversight. > >>> > >>> Please don't take this message as a criticism of the project or its > >>> current chair. This is an expected event in the timeline of many open > >>> source projects, and sometimes results in a renewed interest from the > >>> development community. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Craig > >>> Director, The Apache Software Foundation > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/> > >>> > >>> > >>> >
