Yet another issue. Copyright headers need to be changed to grant
copyright to The Codehaus or The Apache Software Foundation as a team,
not individuals. Please let us know if that's a problem.
On 2/9/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about late response, a lot of work lately.
>
> Some things that i believe are required before the release:
> - rename what it's called Module to Dependency as it's the name used
> all across maven, rename the class, parameters,documentation,...
>
> - mojos run in compile and test-compile phase, which mean that
> standard java compiler may run before it, thus failing in some cases
> (I believe is when a test class extends a main class already weaved).
> Don't know if compiler can be removed from aspectj mojo or aspectj
> should be moved to plexus compiler, if not it has to run in the
> process-sources and process-test-sources phase.
>
> - test classes are not weaved with aspects from main folder, i'm
> looking into this
>
> - use Default Value in mojo docs instead of putting defaults in the
> description (use "default-value" attribute in the javadoc annotation)
>
>
> And some questions
>
> - Weaving jars, where is the output saved?
>
> I think we need to think about these issues before making a 1.0 release.
>
> Regards
>
> On 2/8/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I would like to get this out, so have gotten around to testing it Carlos ?
> > I would sure like to see if there are any errors in the
> > implementation, or if your project not building is a result of the
> > changes in the configuration.
> >
> > Of course you could just post your plugin configuration, and I can
> > convert it for you in no time..
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> > Kaare
> >
> > On 07/02/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > and this time the entire mail (i hate touchpads ;))
> > >
> > > You would need to see the examples at the site, I have done some
> > > changes to the way you configure the plugin. but in short the
> > >
> > > <options>
> > > <option>-showWeaveInfo</option>
> > > </options>
> > > has become
> > > <showWeaveInfo>true</showWeaveInfo>
> > > and so on.
> > >
> > > I have wanted to do so for a long time, and I wanted to get this
> > > resolved before i took it out of the sandbox and people could start to
> > > expect a stable api
> > >
> > > best regards
> > > /Kaare
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/02/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You would need to see the examples at the site, I have done some
> > > > changes to the way you configure the plugin. but in short the
> > > > <options> tag in the configuration is no longer supported and all
> > > > supported compilerargs has their own properties in the plugin e.g
> > > > <option>
> > > > <option>-showWeaveInfo</option>
> > > > </opt
> > > >
> > > > On 07/02/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > -1
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tried it in a project working with an old version that now is not
> > > > > working anymore, so I need some time to test it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/6/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After long time of coding, I finally have a working, and feature
> > > > > > > complete aspectj compiler plugin with good documentation and a
> > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > good testsuite.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The plugin is already in daily use in several projects, and it
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > help theese projects if the plugin was available in an official
> > > > > > > repository.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Based on that i would like to graduate the plugin from the
> > > > > > > sandbox and
> > > > > > > make a first official beta-1 release
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll open up the vote for 72h, then provide a summary
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 from me
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Kaare Nilsen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
