Sorry, I should have omitted only from that sentence. Why are we talking about MPL, etc? Is there any code here that isn't BSD licensed, other than FindBugs and Cobertura?
- Brett Carlos Sanchez wrote: > On 2/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm pretty sure Jeff's email isn't policy. People generally just >> document it as copyright of the ASF. >> >> Carlos Sanchez wrote: >>> If the copyright holder is a person, its permission needs to be >>> obtained in order to do some stuff like change the license. The ASF >>> changed license from v.1 to v.2 and it can happen in the future. If >>> that person is not available anymore (eg. the person dies), the change >>> of license can't be done (or at least would be hard) >>> >> That's only true for the GPL where you aren't allowed to. The ASL let's >> you change the license if you want as long as the notice is in tact. > > > > AFAIK ASL or MPL doesn't allow you to relicense the work, you have to > keep the license. > > You're right about that it's not to bad, i think for mojos MPL that > we'd like to move over apache we would just need to keep the MPL > headers and add ASFL header and say that parts of the work are under > MPL and other parts are under ASFL >
