Still in snapshot... just not in sandbox. http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/jruby-maven-plugin/
Eric On 4/8/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where are the artifacts for it? --jason On Apr 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Eric Redmond wrote: JRuby is not in the sandbox. On 4/8/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I took a stab at updating the site to include the plugins.html page... i > changed the site.xml to include the plugins page in the nav, so I staged > it here for viewing: > http://people.apache.org/~jdillon/mojo-site/index.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdillon/mojo-site/index.html> > > I thought it would be good to leave the index.html as informative, and > leave the plugin detail to the plugins.html page. Though if folks feel > strong about having the plugins list on the index.html I can move them. > > Anyways, lemme know what ya think. I'd like to commit this and update > the site sometime next week. > > --jason > > > On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Eric Redmond wrote: > > > > On 4/7/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > > Kris Bravo wrote: > > >> Jason, > > >> I vote we remove the "reporting" group from your preliminary list > > and > > >> redistribute everthing under it into other categories. Maybe this? > > > > > > I think I would be good to reuse the categories that are found on > > > the main Apache Maven plugins site. That makes it easier for users > > > to find what they are looking for. This would include the category > > > "reporting". > > > > I based the initial categories on what the main Maven site had, but > > we have more types of plugins than they categorize... and some which > > don't fit (like core). > > > > I don't care if we have reporting or not. But I think we need it for > > a few, like taglist and jdepend, which just make reports. I am fine > > to move some of the others into more domain specific categories. But > > I think that its a minor detail, which can be changed later and > > continually updated over time. > > > > Can we come to a consensus about what the first set should be and > > then make it the main list? Or do we need to get a despot to decide > > for us? > > > I like your first draft. +1 on that. > > * * * > > > > I'd like to fill in the remaining descriptions for the sandbox > > plugins, make sure the links all work... and then make it live. > > > > Do we want to keep the plugins.html as the list, and update the > > index.html to link to it? That would be my preference, so that the > > main page can have the basic project information, how to use plugins, > > mailing list and irc details. I will make an example index and > > publish it for viewing later today or tomorrow. > > > > --jason > > > > > > >> Testing > > >> * cobertura-maven-plugin > > >> Documentation > > >> * taglist-maven-plugin > > >> * docbook-maven-plugin > > >> Analysis > > >> * jdepend-maven-plugin > > >> * jdiff-maven-plugin > > >> * javancss-maven-plugin > > >> * rat-maven-plugin > > >> * clirr-maven-plugin > > >> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:39 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote: > > >>> Any ideas what the categories should be... and which plugins go > > >>> where? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I'm not super familiar with all of the plugins hosted there... but > > > > >>> here is a stab: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Scripting > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * groovy-maven-plugin > > >>> * jruby-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Generators/Compilers/Translators (needs a better name, or split > > up) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * aspectj-maven-plugin > > >>> * castor-maven-plugin > > >>> * commons-attributes-maven-plugin > > >>> * hibernate3-maven-plugin > > >>> * idlj-maven-plugin > > >>> * javacc-maven-plugin > > >>> * jaxb2-maven-plugin > > >>> * jpox-maven-plugin > > >>> * jspc-maven-plugin > > >>> * native-maven-plugin > > >>> * retrotranslator-maven-plugin > > >>> * sablecc-maven-plugin > > >>> * smc-maven-plugin > > >>> * wsdl2java-maven-plugin > > >>> * xdoclet-maven-plugin > > >>> * xmlbeans-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Testing > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * selenium-maven-plugin > > >>> * dbunit-maven-plugin > > >>> * findbugs-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> App Server > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * jboss-maven-plugin > > >>> * tomcat-maven-plugin > > >>> * weblogic-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> IDE > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * netbeans-freeform-maven-plugin > > >>> * nbm-maven-plugin > > >>> * ideauidesigner-maven-plugin > > >>> * pde-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Reporting > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * cobertura-maven-plugin > > >>> * javancss-maven-plugin > > >>> * jdepend-maven-plugin > > >>> * jdiff-maven-plugin > > >>> * rat-maven-plugin > > >>> * taglist-maven-plugin > > >>> * docbook-maven-plugin > > >>> * clirr-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Tools > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> * axistools-maven-plugin > > >>> * build-helper-maven-plugin > > >>> * exec-maven-plugin > > >>> * keytool-maven-plugin > > >>> * minijar-maven-plugin > > >>> * native2ascii-maven-plugin > > >>> * sql-maven-plugin > > >>> * xml-maven-plugin > > >>> * webstart-maven-plugin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I might have missed a few... anyways, just a stab at what > > >>> the categories could be. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Any comments? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --jason > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Apr 5, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Eric Redmond wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 4/4/07, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> Can we re-arrange the site plugin list (on this page > > >>>> http:// > > >>>> mojo.codehaus.org/) to group plugins by functionality > > >>>> instead of by > > >>>> release status? > > >>>> Like I'd like to see a "Language Support" group > > or > > >>>> something, that has the groovy-maven-plugin and > > >>>> jruby-maven-plugin. > > >>>> I'd also like to see the latest release version > > >>>> on the page, > > >>>> just > > >>>> like how the main maven plugins page > > >>>> ( http://maven.apache.org/ plugins/ ). > > >>>> I think that the main site index would be a lot > > >>>> easier to > > >>>> grok if we > > >>>> updated it to follow the lead of the mvn plugins page. > > >>>> Comments? > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 but don't involve the sandbox in that grouping. > > >>>> > > >>>> Also, there is a lot of random garbage in the site dav > > >>>> share, looks > > >>>> like some plugins were misconfigured at some point and > > >>>> deployed site information in the wrong > > >>>> directory. Looks like mostly > > >>>> appfuse and > > >>>> weblogic, though did find someother stuff too. I think > > >>>> this > > >>>> should > > >>>> be cleaned up. > > >>>> --jason > > >>>> > > >>>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> -- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Eric Redmond http://codehaus.org/~eredmond > > <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dennis Lundberg > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > -- > Eric Redmond > http://codehaus.org/~eredmond <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond> > > > -- Eric Redmond http://codehaus.org/~eredmond <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond>
-- Eric Redmond http://codehaus.org/~eredmond
