It wasn't promoted until it reached beta 3. I'll release a final version.
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was under the impression that all non-sandboxed plugins were released,
and part of moving out of the sandbox was to make a release.
This is at 1.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, so what happened to the beta-2, beta-1,
alpha releases?
In the current proposed layout, there is a version column, which is to
hold the latest _release_ version. Notice that the sandbox plugins don't
have that... because they aren't released yet, and can not be released until
they move out of the sandbox.
BTW, the jruby-maven-plugin/pom.xml in trunk has its version set to:
1.0-beta-3 (not 1.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT)
... which is a little odd.
* * *
I know that the module is not located in mojo-sandbox, but w/o having a
release version to list then it doesn't fit in any of the categories which
need the latest release for the version column.
I would just release what you have as 1.0-beta-3... though I'm still
wondering where the other releases went.
--jason
On Apr 9, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Eric Redmond wrote:
Still in snapshot... just not in sandbox.
http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/jruby-maven-plugin/
Eric
On 4/8/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where are the artifacts for it?
> --jason
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Eric Redmond wrote:
>
> JRuby is not in the sandbox.
>
> On 4/8/07, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I took a stab at updating the site to include the plugins.html page...
> > i changed the site.xml to include the plugins page in the nav, so I
> > staged it here for viewing:
> >
http://people.apache.org/~jdillon/mojo-site/index.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdillon/mojo-site/index.html>
> >
> > I thought it would be good to leave the index.html as informative, and
> > leave the plugin detail to the plugins.html page. Though if folks
> > feel strong about having the plugins list on the index.html I can move
> > them.
> >
> > Anyways, lemme know what ya think. I'd like to commit this and update
> > the site sometime next week.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Eric Redmond wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/7/07, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > > > Kris Bravo wrote:
> > > >> Jason,
> > > >> I vote we remove the "reporting" group from your preliminary list
> > > and
> > > >> redistribute everthing under it into other categories. Maybe
> > > this?
> > > >
> > > > I think I would be good to reuse the categories that are found on
> > > > the main Apache Maven plugins site. That makes it easier for users
> > > > to find what they are looking for. This would include the category
> > >
> > > > "reporting".
> > >
> > > I based the initial categories on what the main Maven site had, but
> > > we have more types of plugins than they categorize... and some which
> > > don't fit (like core).
> > >
> > > I don't care if we have reporting or not. But I think we need it
> > > for
> > > a few, like taglist and jdepend, which just make reports. I am fine
> > > to move some of the others into more domain specific
> > > categories. But
> > > I think that its a minor detail, which can be changed later and
> > > continually updated over time.
> > >
> > > Can we come to a consensus about what the first set should be and
> > > then make it the main list? Or do we need to get a despot to decide
> > > for us?
> >
> >
> > I like your first draft. +1 on that.
> >
> > * * *
> > >
> > > I'd like to fill in the remaining descriptions for the sandbox
> > > plugins, make sure the links all work... and then make it live.
> > >
> > > Do we want to keep the plugins.html as the list, and update the
> > > index.html to link to it? That would be my preference, so that the
> > > main page can have the basic project information, how to use
> > > plugins,
> > > mailing list and irc details. I will make an example index and
> > > publish it for viewing later today or tomorrow.
> > >
> > > --jason
> > >
> > >
> > > >> Testing
> > > >> * cobertura-maven-plugin
> > > >> Documentation
> > > >> * taglist-maven-plugin
> > > >> * docbook-maven-plugin
> > > >> Analysis
> > > >> * jdepend-maven-plugin
> > > >> * jdiff-maven-plugin
> > > >> * javancss-maven-plugin
> > > >> * rat-maven-plugin
> > > >> * clirr-maven-plugin
> > > >> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:39 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
> > > >>> Any ideas what the categories should be... and which plugins go
> > > >>> where?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm not super familiar with all of the plugins hosted there...
> > > but
> > > >>> here is a stab:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Scripting
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * groovy-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jruby-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Generators/Compilers/Translators (needs a better name, or split
> > > up)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * aspectj-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * castor-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * commons-attributes-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * hibernate3-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * idlj-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * javacc-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jaxb2-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jpox-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jspc-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * native-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * retrotranslator-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * sablecc-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * smc-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * wsdl2java-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * xdoclet-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * xmlbeans-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Testing
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * selenium-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * dbunit-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * findbugs-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> App Server
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * jboss-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * tomcat-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * weblogic-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> IDE
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * netbeans-freeform-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * nbm-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * ideauidesigner-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * pde-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Reporting
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * cobertura-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * javancss-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jdepend-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * jdiff-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * rat-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * taglist-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * docbook-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * clirr-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Tools
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * axistools-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * build-helper-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * exec-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * keytool-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * minijar-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * native2ascii-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * sql-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * xml-maven-plugin
> > > >>> * webstart-maven-plugin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I might have missed a few... anyways, just a stab at what
> > > >>> the categories could be.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Any comments?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --jason
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Apr 5, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Eric Redmond wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 4/4/07, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>> Can we re-arrange the site plugin list (on this page
> > > >>>> http://
> > > >>>> mojo.codehaus.org/) to group plugins by functionality
> > > >>>> instead of by
> > > >>>> release status?
> > > >>>> Like I'd like to see a "Language Support" group
> > > or
> > > >>>> something, that has the groovy-maven-plugin and
> > >
> > > >>>> jruby-maven-plugin.
> > > >>>> I'd also like to see the latest release version
> > > >>>> on the page,
> > > >>>> just
> > > >>>> like how the main maven plugins page
> > > >>>> ( http://maven.apache.org/ plugins/ ).
> > > >>>> I think that the main site index would be a lot
> > > >>>> easier to
> > > >>>> grok if we
> > > >>>> updated it to follow the lead of the mvn plugins page.
> > > >>>> Comments?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 but don't involve the sandbox in that grouping.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Also, there is a lot of random garbage in the site dav
> > > >>>> share, looks
> > > >>>> like some plugins were misconfigured at some point and
> > > >>>> deployed site information in the wrong
> > > >>>> directory. Looks like mostly
> > > >>>> appfuse and
> > > >>>> weblogic, though did find someother stuff too. I think
> > >
> > > >>>> this
> > > >>>> should
> > > >>>> be cleaned up.
> > > >>>> --jason
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> -- To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > > >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Eric Redmond http://codehaus.org/~eredmond
> > > <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dennis Lundberg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > > >
> > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > >
> > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eric Redmond
> > http://codehaus.org/~eredmond <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Eric Redmond
> http://codehaus.org/~eredmond <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond>
>
>
>
--
Eric Redmond
http://codehaus.org/~eredmond <http://codehaus.org/%7Eeredmond>
--
Eric Redmond
http://codehaus.org/~eredmond
