I think I would prefer a directory called "mojo". So "mojo/gwt-maven-plugin.git" instead of "mojo-gwt-maven-plugin.git" WDYT?
On 06/23/2011 04:37 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Looking at http://git.codehaus.org/gitweb.cgi it looks to me we want > something like jbehave has done. > In our case that would mean something like "mojo-gwt-maven-plugin.git" > or "mojo-gwtmavenplugin" or... > our /trunk/mojo has 89 projects, I'm not sure if we have to do some > cleanup here (could be part a the vote) > > I still believe we should keep the master at codehaus: one account > to access all (scm as in svn or git, Jira, Bamboo, Confluence, Fisheye) > According to this thread it's possible to sync this with github. > > So it seems like every could be pleased, right? > > -Robert > >> From: hu...@internode.on.net >> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:13:43 +1000 >> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git (was: preparing > 2.3.0 release -> github ) >> >> +1 for moving to git - much easier to work with remotely. >> +1 for moving each mojo to its own git repo >> >> On the latter point, you *need* to do this. Anything that potentially > requires its own tag or branch needs its own git repo. >> >> Kind regards, >> Christopher >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
