The convention "group/project-repo" seems to be followed on other sites as well.
http://git.kernel.org/ On 06/23/2011 08:14 PM, Paul Gier wrote: > Not sure I understand you. I wasn't saying we should have a single git > repo, I was suggesting that each plugin/project is located in it's own > git repo under the common directory "mojo". Instead of prefixing the > name of the repo with "mojo-". Either way there is one git repo per > mojo project. This would be somewhat similar to how the repos would be > set up on github. For example: > > https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/gwt-maven-plugin > https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/buildnumber-maven-plugin > > On the codehaus repo we could have something like > http://git.codehaus.org/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin.git > > On 06/23/2011 05:54 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> until you try to release. >> >> if you release separately, you need separate git repositories. >> >> if you release at the same time, same git repo. >> >> so animal-sniffer would be one repo for the tools, one repo for each of >> the signatures. >> >> - Stephen >> >> --- >> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense >> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on >> the screen >> >> On 23 Jun 2011 23:41, "Paul Gier" <pg...@redhat.com >> <mailto:pg...@redhat.com>> wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
