Not sure I understand you. I wasn't saying we should have a single git repo, I was suggesting that each plugin/project is located in it's own git repo under the common directory "mojo". Instead of prefixing the name of the repo with "mojo-". Either way there is one git repo per mojo project. This would be somewhat similar to how the repos would be set up on github. For example:
https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/gwt-maven-plugin https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/buildnumber-maven-plugin On the codehaus repo we could have something like http://git.codehaus.org/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin.git On 06/23/2011 05:54 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > until you try to release. > > if you release separately, you need separate git repositories. > > if you release at the same time, same git repo. > > so animal-sniffer would be one repo for the tools, one repo for each of > the signatures. > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on > the screen > > On 23 Jun 2011 23:41, "Paul Gier" <pg...@redhat.com > <mailto:pg...@redhat.com>> wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
