+1
2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > 0: I'm not currently bothered either way > > > On 23 July 2013 14:19, Baptiste Mathus <bapti...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our >> recent discussion about this. >> >> *Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the >> path.* >> >> (So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories, >> when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and >> discussions if this one succeeds). >> >> [ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus(without >> having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of >> a migration away from svn. >> [ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care. >> [ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is. >> >> This vote is open for 72 hours. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- Baptiste >> > > -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
