On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:11:40PM +0200, Fred Cooke wrote: > Even though I'm the biggest Git fan ever, bar maybe Linus, -1 until > m-rel-p and m-site-p are properly fixed. Once they're stable for DVCS > usage then BIG +1, but not before.
I'm +1. What are the problems with the release plugin? I've used it with many projects that's using without any problems. -- Trygve > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Brett Okken <brett.okken...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 0 - I have had no issues with svn. > > > > On Jul 23, 2013 8:20 AM, "Baptiste Mathus" <bapti...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our > >> recent discussion about this. > >> > >> *Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the > >> path.* > >> > >> (So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories, > >> when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and > >> discussions > >> if this one succeeds). > >> > >> [ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus (without > >> having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of a > >> migration away from svn. > >> [ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care. > >> [ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is. > >> > >> This vote is open for 72 hours. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> -- Baptiste > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
