Even though I'm the biggest Git fan ever, bar maybe Linus, -1 until
m-rel-p and m-site-p are properly fixed. Once they're stable for DVCS
usage then BIG +1, but not before.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Brett Okken <brett.okken...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 0 - I have had no issues with svn.
>
> On Jul 23, 2013 8:20 AM, "Baptiste Mathus" <bapti...@codehaus.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our
>> recent discussion about this.
>>
>> *Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the
>> path.*
>>
>> (So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories,
>> when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and discussions
>> if this one succeeds).
>>
>> [ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus (without
>> having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of a
>> migration away from svn.
>> [ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care.
>> [ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is.
>>
>> This vote is open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Baptiste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
