Git certainly is the way, and perhaps the "sink or swim" method will bring benefits, or perhaps the use cases in MOJO don't trip over any of the brokenness, but I sure do with my stuff, and am forced to work around it in ugly ways.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Rickard von Essen < rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > Git is the way. > > // Rickard > > Hi, > > The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our > recent discussion about this. > > *Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the > path.* > > (So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories, > when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and > discussions if this one succeeds). > > [ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus(without > having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of > a migration away from svn. > [ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care. > [ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is. > > This vote is open for 72 hours. > > Thanks > > -- Baptiste >
