-1
I don't have issues with subversion and I know some GIT black belts have
great ideas how this should be done.
However, I think this is a very critical step so I'd prefer not do this
vote during the summer holidays to give does experienced team members a
chance to respond (and to enjoy their holiday).
Robert
ps. During another period I would have voted +0
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:19:50 +0200, Baptiste Mathus
<bapti...@codehaus.org> wrote:
Hi,
The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our
recent discussion about this.
*Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the
path.*
(So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories,
when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and
discussions if this one succeeds).
[ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus
(without
having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of a
migration away from svn.
[ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care.
[ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is.
This vote is open for 72 hours.
Thanks
-- Baptiste
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
