+0 svn works for me. May be we should wait for all plugin's at apache maven to migrate first?
-D On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > +0 > > I expect a switch to git to include good and detailed instructions for eg > releases. > > /Anders (mobile) > Den 23 jul 2013 15:19 skrev "Baptiste Mathus" <bapti...@codehaus.org>: > > Hi, >> >> The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our >> recent discussion about this. >> >> *Just checking here nobody is against moving mojo to git, whatever be the >> path.* >> >> (So, this *vote is NOT* about dirty details like how many repositories, >> when, how, github or not, and so on. There'll be other votes and >> discussions if this one succeeds). >> >> [ ] +1: yes, I'd like to be able to use pure git at mojo@codehaus(without >> having to resort to git-svn and the likes) and ok with the idea of >> a migration away from svn. >> [ ] 0: prrrt. Don't care. >> [ ] -1: bad idea, keep it as-is. >> >> This vote is open for 72 hours. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- Baptiste >> >
