@Sandeep, I've updated the release assets
with apache-mxnet-src-1.1.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz which contains submodule
source code. Please use the apache one to build. Thanks.

Best,
Haibin

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I guess that was an oversight. rc2 has the full source.
> I remember it generally has the source because there were complaints that
> there were licensing issues with the dmlc files.
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Haibin Lin <haibin.lin....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > @Chris Are pre-releases expected to include submodules? I checked
> 1.0.0.rc0
> > and 1.0.0.rc1, neither of them contain source code of submodules.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All other relases have the submodule sources included
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:00 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> > > sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I downloaded source from -
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/archive/1.1.0.rc0.tar.gz
> and
> > > > tried to build from source.
> > > > Build failed as submodules (ps-list, mshadow) are empty directory in
> > the
> > > > source tar.
> > > >
> > > > Is this expected to not include submodules in source tar?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> > > > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Indhu <indhubhara...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:16 PM Chris Olivier <
> > cjolivie...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Haibin Lin <
> > > > haibin.lin....@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Update:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Link to release candidate 1.1.0.rc0:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.1.
> > > 0.rc0/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Link to the release tag:
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.1.0.rc0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Haibin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Haibin Lin <
> > > > > haibin.lin....@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Given that most people on dev@ are in favor of a minor
> > release
> > > > > > (1.1.0)
> > > > > > > > > instead of a patch release due to API changes, I'd like to
> > > > propose
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > vote
> > > > > > > > > to release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0. Voting will
> start
> > > now
> > > > > > > > (Sunday,
> > > > > > > > > January 28th) and end at 1pm Wednesday, January 31th PST.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> > > > > > > > > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.1.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Link to release candidate 1.1.0.rc0:
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > 1.1.0.rc0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > View this page and scroll down to “Build from Source” with
> > > source
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > obtained from the 1.1.0.rc0 tag:
> > > > > > > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.1.0 tag and does not
> > work
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > moment.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Haibin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to