OK... we can have the myfaces-all jar. I agree with naming it myfaces-all too, that will be less confusing. For the record, I use the current myfaces.jar all the time myself
So this would be part of the implementation bundle then? That would go along with Oliver's suggestion. It would mean that we would update the implementation bundle with every tomahawk release so that tomahawk-lite and myfaces-all could be used by those who are running the myfaces implementation. sean On 5/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on myfaces-all.jar > ;) > > On 5/27/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree with Martin that the jar with all the stuff is very useful, at least > > for me that I update the jar very often. With only one jar I can discard > > that I have done a mistake deploying the jars when an exception or error is > > thrown. My 2 euro cents... > > > > Bruno > > > > 2005/5/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I would still supply a catch-it-all you get it all jar file. > > > > > > It's just so much easier, and there are many frameworks supplying > > > something like that. > > > > > > To avoid confusion, we should name it: > > > > > > myfaces-all.jar > > > > > > though, I think! > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 5/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Can someone please elaborate on what the "shared" code contains and > > > > > why it is in "quotes"? :-) > > > > > > > > This refers to the code currently in the trunk under src/share. It > > > > refers to code that is used in both the implentation as well as the > > > > custom components. > > > > > > > > > John Fallows. > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf >
