Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch? regards,
Martin On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having a look at tomahawk 416 +1 for creating a 1.2 branch On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most of the > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you look at the > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you look at the section in the > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release" you can > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much done everything in that > list. > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to implement > several sections of the spec: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle(). I needed code that reads the new > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all the ELResolver stuff is > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. > > I've also done some of the issues listed under General Changes. For > each item in that list, I created a Jira task. You can look at Jira and > see which ones I did. > > I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package when I was > taken off of the project. I probably won't commit any changes from > that. I didn't touch the components or renderer at all. With all the > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the components > still work even though they are written the "1.1 way". > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF 1.2 impl > that is about half-way done and still works. > > Stan Silvert > JBoss, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > callto://stansilvert > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a serious > issue > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link renderers? > > If not, i am > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major issues to be fixed in > the > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev discussions.) > I > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest in the > core > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to sustain this > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from anyone else besides > Stan? > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and a fork > helps. > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this will never > end. > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really pressing, > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the default > JSF > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was possible in > > JEE4 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
