+1 for the release! Although it also concerns me a bit the lack of
knowledge/interest of most of the myfaces committers in tobago,

Cheers!

Bruno

On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really.
>
> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
>
> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.

FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a
MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested
in Tobago.  On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in
the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger
signal.

> Regards
>
>
> Bernd

Craig


> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > too late ?
> >
> > +1
> > ...
> >
> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> >
> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Wendy,
> >> >
> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
+1(non-binding).
> >> >
> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >> >
> >> > [1]
http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> The relevant sections are:
> >>
http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >>    ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> >> an anchor.
> >>
> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :)  Release votes are
> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed.  (I've never
> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to