Hello,
you can download the tobago examples from
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
See this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/13/06, L Frohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
Tomahawk?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> Tobago is a danger signal.
I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
that it's
almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
incompatible frameworks.
I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
(or at
least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
other, I
think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
member to
vote on a Tobago release.
