It would be good to split a monolithic jar into smaller jars with clear dependencies. This makes it easy for developers to choose the functionality based on the needs .
I could think of the breakdown like: - a jar for dojo - a jar with shared utility code - a jar with all validators - a jar with all converters - a jar with components and renderers only - a jar with taglib codefor JSF components. (e.g: somebody instantiating JSF components dynamically do not need this) just my 2 cents, thanks -Ravi R ----- Original Message ---- From: Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:38:10 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Dojo into Tomahawk I don't want a jar for dojo, I suggest a jar for converters, validators, aliasBeanTag, saveStateTag and other parts of tomahawk.jar which are complete renderer independent and may also be usefull in jsf application which don't use tomahawk. it is e.g. not possible to mix tobago with tomahawk components, so if i want to use e.g. the aliasBeanTag, which did not need the renderer, i have to add the tomawak.jar with all the incomplatible components to my tobago application. Volker 2006/9/13, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > werner, volker, > > what about "tomahawk-dojo" ? > or myfaces-dojo ? > > > On 9/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Werner, > > > > can you explain the "sun guys thing" ? > > I think I don't get it. > > > > regarding myfaces-commons.jar there was already something like that, > > now it's shared. > > > > mmm > > > > On 9/13/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Volker Weber schrieb: > > > aging them into tobago.jars. > > > > > > > > I had suggested this before, but it was deferred because of the switch > > > > to maven build and the first maven build relase. > > > > > > > > What about creating this new artifact now? > > > > > > > +1 for such a thing... I think dojo and its general code artefacts > > > are the perfect candidate to do that. > > > > > > but I do not have enough maven knowledge to do it. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
