Mike Kienenberger schrieb: > [Note that I moved the discussion on jar splitting to another thread > -- please use that thread instead of this one] > > Werner, I'm for the idea in general, but I'm -1 on doing it before we > make a 1.1.4 Tomahawk branch. > > We need to get a matching version of Tomahawk out since the > RI-compatibility changes Martin made to the form clearing javascript > will make using Tomahawk 1.1.3 and MyFaces 1.1.4 incompatible (as far > as I understand them). > > Once we branch Tomahawk 1.1.4, then we can make major changes to the > trunck. > > Or to restate it another way -- it's far more important to have > something out there that works with what we've done so far than it is > to introduce new features from the sandbox. >
Ok Mike, thanks for the clarification, I thought the 1.1.4 tom branching already was done, I will wait for the rebranch then. Any idea when you guys are going to rebranch?
