This is not realy a issue, the files are part of the autogenerated tlddoc.
the radiomenu.html is the description of the deprecated <tc:radiomenu>
tag which was renamed to <tc:radioMenu>.

the attributes are the same, if you compare these two pages in a
browser the only diffrence are the line:
**** Deprecated. Will be removed in a future version ****
at the top of menuradio.html.

2006/9/13, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1 for release if the case-insensitve filesystem issue is resolved...


On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Not really.
>
> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
>
> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Bernd
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > too late ?
> >
> > +1
> > ...
> >
> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> >
> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Wendy,
> >> >
> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
+1(non-binding).
> >> >
> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >> >
> >> > [1]
http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> The relevant sections are:
> >>
http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >>    ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> >> an anchor.
> >>
> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :)  Release votes are
> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed.  (I've never
> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
> >
>



--
Grant Smith

Reply via email to