One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part of
the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I have
hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests provided by
the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that however.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
(representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the Apache
community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK and the
future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
Scott
Dennis Byrne wrote:
believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
community.
Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, and
a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration loop
right next the unit tests. Thanks
Thanks,
Scott
--
Dennis Byrne
