I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch -Andrew
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk. > I'd like to *swap* the trunks. > > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad > > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10 > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big* > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or > enhancements (new (api) features). > > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes. > > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a) > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make > sense > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0 > features require JSF 1.2. > > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that > has a more detailed outline. > > -Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
