+1 regards, gerhard
2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch > > -Andrew > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however > > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk. > > I'd like to *swap* the trunks. > > > > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad > > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad > > > > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10 > > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big* > > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or > > enhancements (new (api) features). > > > > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a > > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes. > > > > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a) > > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make > > sense > > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0 > > features require JSF 1.2. > > > > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that > > has a more detailed outline. > > > > -Matthias > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
