+1 Cagatay
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch >> >> -Andrew >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however >> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk. >> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks. >> > >> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad >> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad >> > >> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10 >> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big* >> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or >> > enhancements (new (api) features). >> > >> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a >> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes. >> > >> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a) >> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make >> > sense >> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0 >> > features require JSF 1.2. >> > >> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that >> > has a more detailed outline. >> > >> > -Matthias >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
