Ok. Sorry. I will do it next week.
Sent from my iPod.
Am 07.11.2008 um 20:49 schrieb "Grant Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
However, is there any chance of clearing out some of the branches/
in the svn repo ? Theres a ton of branches, do we really need them
all ? Doing a clean myfaces/ checkout was a real pain with all that
extra bloat.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
+1
Cagatay
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
-Andrew
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
> is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
> I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
>
> trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
> trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
>
> Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
> release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
> improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
> enhancements (new (api) features).
>
> I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go
into a
> maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
>
> Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
> spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
> sense
> to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
> features require JSF 1.2.
>
> Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
> has a more detailed outline.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
Grant Smith
