Hi +1. I suppose this code conflict with MYFACES-2290 Add OSGi bundle information and bundle classloader / activator, but we can see it in deep later when we have committed this one.
regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/8/11 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > +1 for adding that to 2.0 only. > > looking forward :-) > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Werner Punz<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello everyone. I am sort of overdue with my promised commit of the > myfaces > > groovy bindings, the reason simply was life itself. > > > > Anway to make things finally clear I want to propose following. > > I want to commit the bindings this week, but I want to opt for myfaces > 2.0 > > instead of still going with 1.2. > > > > The reason simply is following: > > I need to add a mechanism which allows to replace the classloader > > during initialisation which means following we have to add code > > to our initialisation code in our servlet context which allows this. > > Now that 2.0 still is in development this is less critical than to add it > to > > a stable 1.2. > > > > And to be honest I do not want to support two versions of myfaces for the > > initial stage. > > So here is the deal, I will commit the codebase this week, which still > has > > the dirty initialisation and add the needed extensions asap in the 2.0 > > codebase and I will work on make it running so that we have the extension > up > > and running when we hit final, sort of a goody to have > > if you use myfaces. > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
