@things change: for sure - i just couldn't see a reason in this case. so i pointed to the discussion we had some months ago. (basically i'm fine with "rethinking") anyway i agree with the arguments mentioned by werner.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/8/12 Werner Punz <[email protected]> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Werner Punz<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > >>> in the original discussion we decided that. > >>> you agreed as well. ;) > > > > that does not mean I can rethink it. things change... > > > >> Besides that, it was one of the reasons why we opened an extension > >> subproject, scripting support definitely should be an extension until > >> we have a spec in this area. > > > > there will never be something written in the jsf spec on this; groovy > guys > > are lazy; they will never finish their JSR, IMO > > > Well I assume since java itself has a scripting hook (which does not go > very far except a neutral api to trigger the interpreter), we probably > will get a neutral hook for scripting languages in jsf as well. > > But as I said I think we should work within the scope of the extension > project for now until we have all the container quirks worked out, then > we can rethink the core integration. > > Werner > >
