2009/8/11 Werner Punz <[email protected]>

> I dont think it will conflict, the reason for this is, I want to add the
> option as web.xml override.
> Which means a user who wants to use the groovy bindings has to add a
> context param. If this param is not set nothing is done and the code
> defaults to the code currently in existence.
>

Hi

Ok, I understand. In ViewDeclarationLanguage class there is a method called
getScriptComponentResource. Do you have any plan to write this method, so
users can write jsf components in groovy?

regards

Leonardo Uribe


>
> The groovy bindings are a plugin like extval.
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> +1. I suppose this code conflict with MYFACES-2290 Add OSGi bundle
>> information and bundle classloader / activator, but we can see it in deep
>> later when we have committed this one.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2009/8/11 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>>
>>    +1 for adding that to 2.0 only.
>>
>>    looking forward :-)
>>
>>    On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Werner Punz<[email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>     > Hello everyone. I am sort of overdue with my promised commit of
>>    the myfaces
>>     > groovy bindings, the reason simply was life itself.
>>     >
>>     > Anway to make things finally clear I want to propose following.
>>     > I want to commit the bindings this week, but I want to opt for
>>    myfaces 2.0
>>     > instead of still going with 1.2.
>>     >
>>     > The reason simply is following:
>>     > I need to add a mechanism which allows to replace the classloader
>>     > during initialisation which means following we have to add code
>>     > to our initialisation code in our servlet context which allows this.
>>     > Now that 2.0 still is in development this is less critical than
>>    to add it to
>>     > a stable 1.2.
>>     >
>>     > And to be honest I do not want to support two versions of myfaces
>>    for the
>>     > initial stage.
>>     > So here is the deal, I will commit the codebase this week, which
>>    still has
>>     > the dirty initialisation and add the needed extensions asap in
>>    the 2.0
>>     > codebase and I will work on make it running so that we have the
>>    extension up
>>     > and running when we hit final, sort of a goody to have
>>     > if you use myfaces.
>>     >
>>     > Werner
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>>    blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>    sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>    twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to