+1 for the initial commit at [1] regards, gerhard
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/scripting http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/8/12 Werner Punz <[email protected]> > I have to check the method out for what it does out for now nothing is done > in this regard. > > My code works currently that way that over all jsf artefacts which can > be set via the faces-config proxies are wrapped around and the proxies > basically > dynamically reload the groovy classes if the file dates change (hence the > classloader). > > So what we get are dynamically reloadable beans, phase listeners, > etc... pretty much everything from the faces-config. > I am not sure how well this mixes with the new annotations. > > > Werner > > > > Leonardo Uribe schrieb: > >> >> >> 2009/8/11 Werner Punz <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> >> I dont think it will conflict, the reason for this is, I want to add >> the option as web.xml override. >> Which means a user who wants to use the groovy bindings has to add a >> context param. If this param is not set nothing is done and the code >> defaults to the code currently in existence. >> >> >> Hi >> >> Ok, I understand. In ViewDeclarationLanguage class there is a method >> called getScriptComponentResource. Do you have any plan to write this >> method, so users can write jsf components in groovy? >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> The groovy bindings are a plugin like extval. >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe schrieb: >> >> Hi >> >> +1. I suppose this code conflict with MYFACES-2290 Add OSGi >> bundle information and bundle classloader / activator, but we >> can see it in deep later when we have committed this one. >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2009/8/11 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> >> >> >> +1 for adding that to 2.0 only. >> >> looking forward :-) >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Werner >> Punz<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> > Hello everyone. I am sort of overdue with my promised >> commit of >> the myfaces >> > groovy bindings, the reason simply was life itself. >> > >> > Anway to make things finally clear I want to propose >> following. >> > I want to commit the bindings this week, but I want to opt >> for >> myfaces 2.0 >> > instead of still going with 1.2. >> > >> > The reason simply is following: >> > I need to add a mechanism which allows to replace the >> classloader >> > during initialisation which means following we have to add >> code >> > to our initialisation code in our servlet context which >> allows this. >> > Now that 2.0 still is in development this is less critical >> than >> to add it to >> > a stable 1.2. >> > >> > And to be honest I do not want to support two versions of >> myfaces >> for the >> > initial stage. >> > So here is the deal, I will commit the codebase this week, >> which >> still has >> > the dirty initialisation and add the needed extensions asap >> in >> the 2.0 >> > codebase and I will work on make it running so that we >> have the >> extension up >> > and running when we hit final, sort of a goody to have >> > if you use myfaces. >> > >> > Werner >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> >> >
