+1 for starting in extension. When it's stable and properly tested, we
can always migrate it into the core.

Regards,
Jan-Kees

2009/8/12 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Gerhard
> Petracek<[email protected]> wrote:
>> @things change:
>> for sure - i just couldn't see a reason in this case. so i pointed to the
>> discussion we had some months ago.
>> (basically i'm fine with "rethinking") anyway i agree with the arguments
>> mentioned by werner.
>
> +1
>
> I just want it to be come core over time; as getting groovy as simple
> as possible
> could be a decission against (or for) myfaces. the more complex, the worse.
>
> Well, anyway - starting in extension is fine........................
>
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/8/12 Werner Punz <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Werner Punz<[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Gerhard Petracek schrieb:
>>> >>> in the original discussion we decided that.
>>> >>> you agreed as well. ;)
>>> >
>>> > that does not mean I can rethink it. things change...
>>> >
>>> >> Besides that, it was one of the reasons why we opened an extension
>>> >> subproject, scripting support definitely should be an extension until
>>> >> we have a spec in this area.
>>> >
>>> > there will never be something written in the jsf spec on this; groovy
>>> > guys
>>> > are lazy; they will never finish their JSR, IMO
>>> >
>>> Well I assume since java itself has a scripting hook (which does not go
>>> very far except a neutral api to trigger the interpreter), we probably
>>> will get a neutral hook for scripting languages in jsf as well.
>>>
>>> But as I said I think we should work within the scope of the extension
>>> project for now until we have all the container quirks worked out, then
>>> we can rethink the core integration.
>>>
>>> Werner
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Reply via email to