thats where it stops the edu version of j-link is not suiteable if you want to 
build a commercial product .. for home tinkerers ofc .. there are other jtag 
programmers .. like black magic probe ( opensource jtag debug / programming 
probe)  / st link v2 suitable doing that

there is a bug in gdb for makeing it work easily with say a flashed stlink v2 
with bmp firmware .. but you can still write them as single image ..

that would be a cheap production option …


> On 15 Aug 2017, at 23:04, Kevin Townsend <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It doesn't have an on-board J-Link, but that's why it's relatively 
> inexpensive, and you can purchase $20 J-Link EDUs now if you qualify for 
> those license terms: https://www.adafruit.com/product/3571
> 
> The more expensive options out there have a J-Link on board (nRF52DK board 
> from Nordic), but I think having an inexpensive board and ONE J-Link plus on 
> board LIPO battery charging makes more sense for multiple devices, and the 
> physical size is more useful in the real world, along with easy access to a 
> number of add-on HW: https://www.adafruit.com/Feather
> 
> But sorry, I **REALLY** don't want to promote the Adafruit board on the dev 
> list! I just wanted to give a simple heads up that after a lot of delay, it's 
> finally in production, and we'll release the iOS app (and source code) 
> shortly, which is potentially useful to other people on this dev list.
> 
> Our main ambition is getting this in the shop was just to help out on a 
> project we believe solves some real problems elegantly (fully open source BLE 
> stack, etc.), and offers people a stepping stone towards a commercial 
> friendly open source development platform.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> On 15/08/17 23:55, Brian Giori wrote:
>> Wow! This really has everything, and for $28 it's a steal. I'll be picking
>> one up when they go on sale. Great job!
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Townsend <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to