Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > >>Second, I believe that one of the traditions of free and open > >>source software is usually not to take any part in politics; > > > >I think RMS would disagree with this. His site is packed with politics, > >and I don't mean about open source vs free software. I mean real politics. > > I think RMS would agree since the tradition I'm referring to is the one > of the FSF: > http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050211.html
Title: "Why we don't have political terms in our licenses" I certainly don't think we should have political terms in the license. But that's not the same as "not taking any part in politics". RMS is very politically active, and encourages others to be as well. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
