Hi Sophie, *, On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:30:35PM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > [...] > I'd like to recall here that this request was not only concerning RFEs, > but also existing features that are removed or changed without any > concertation.
Yes! > As a good example of our help and contributions I'd like > to point two of them (no, no this is not the Stylist ;) among others : > http://graphics.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=631 > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48059 > related to this one > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36372 (the feedback I > had from ministries is very strong here). I filed issue 48146 to complement the scenario: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48146 It's all but obvious to me why the behaviour of the buttons did change. It broke, I filed the issue (36372). It worked again, then the behaviour of the buttons did change :-( (and issue 48059 was filed) > >[...] > >1. First, that we re-initiate the discussion of handling community input > >for 3.0. It's too early to set a date for when we should do this by, > >but it makes sense to start thinking of it. > (Why is it too early? > >Because there is no good sense even of what 3.0 will look like.) > > This is not too early because with the 2.0, Well - talking about OOo 3.0 ist too early given that we don't know what the process will be for OOo 2.1 > we are benifiting or will > benefit from a lot of feedback from users having needs that will not be > covered by 2.0 are no longer covered by it, so if the demand is strong > there might be considered for 3.0 or even sooner (my thoughts go to the > graphics module or some Calc functionalities). Sooner! (for OOo 2.1) > [...] ciao Christian -- NP: Creed - Beautiful --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
