Andre Schnabel wrote:
Great for INGOTs. But please remember, that we are targeting hunderts if
not thousands of contributors. It's ok to raise the problms of the
OOo-environment and suggest better soultions.
I'm glad you think so. Subversion is the most "proven" alternative to
CVS, and the most similar. I'm a fan of Darcs, but Subversion would
likely be a better fit for OOo.
As for the number of contributors, *all* of the alternatives I listed
would be *better* for handling many contributors. After all, one of the
problems of CVS is the difficulty in branching and merging again, which
tends to limit the number of contributors. This is why the only people
who merge braches are the developers in Hamburg.
And please .. as long as you don't have the perfect solution that would
fit to all peoples needs
I do: Subversion
stop using words like "sucks". That's rather "trollish" behaviour and
in no way helpfull for our community.
Saying CVS sucks is a very mild thing, to say. It's not intended as
trolling. OOo developers also say that CVS sucks. CVS developers say
that CVS sucks (that's why they made Subversion). It's a known fact.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/ No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
\/_/ However, a significant number of electrons were
/ were severely inconvenienced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
