Konrad Stobiecki wrote:
I think Daniel was treated too serious, because he used bad words to
express himself. Everyone started replying in "Hey, how dare you calling
my work crap?" way:) I don't think it was Daniel's intention to express
bad about the project or anyone. But it is a lesson that it is good to
talk polite:)
Indeed. Especially online when you can't transmit tone of voice and body
language. I did put a smiley next to the word "sucks", but I guess it's
not the same thing. Btw, I didn't say that the work of anyone here was
crap. I was referring to CVS. And the authors of CVS agree with me.
In any event, I didn't mean my post badly. I was just waving my little
"Darcs rulez" flag and suggesting a product that would likely be a
welcome improvement for all the people using CVS at OOo (Subversion).
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/ No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
\/_/ However, a significant number of electrons were
/ were severely inconvenienced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
