Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
I've checked out all the other ones. None seems to be suitable for OOo,
leaving subversion as the only reasonable alternative to CVS.
I agree. As much as I like distributed systems, we can't forget the
development model that OOo is coming from. It's very centralized and
slow to change. Going from CVS to a decentralized system might be too
big a jump, even if they are technologically superior. If that's the
case, that removes every alternative to CVS except for Subversion.
From a code-base size POV, Monotone and Subversion should both be fine.
And perhaps Darcs too (there's a mirror of the Linux kernel in Darcs).
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/ No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
\/_/ However, a significant number of electrons were
/ were severely inconvenienced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
