On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 06:20, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]> wrote: > How will those guys find out what has happened and how to fix the problem?
When their build breaks they look it up / come and ask us. If we get a few queries, we put a notice on the front page of the website. Don't see an issue here at all. > PS: Redirecting to Oracle server is acceptable, redirecting to my backup > isn't? What a level of trust. Thank you, Neil! Fixed that for you! ;-) This has nothing to do with trust. and everything to do with transparency. And ASF trademarks, domains, etc. Transparently redirecting previously existing links away from Apache to the third-party owner of the legacy artefacts, and putting responsibility for those on them, is fundamentally different to redirecting to a different new third party, even you! Are either or both acceptable in the longer term? That's something we should discuss as a PMC. But I don't think we should just accept they amount to the same thing, or we should do it without informing people. You should now have been CC'd into an off-list email conversation involving Oracle on these. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
