Hi,
I would love to see the javadocs for the platform in future releases,
these are very useful for NBRCP developers.
Cheers,
Antonio
P.S.: Building the javadocs is not very eco-friendly, so it's better to
create them once per release instead of once per developer. ;-)
On 17/11/17 10:44, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Excellent, thanks.
It seems to me we have everything in place to go ahead with the IPMC vote.
It would be useful though if one or our mentors would check through
everything first, especially since this is the first time we're doing this
for this part of Apache NetBeans. I'd feel more comfortable going to the
IPMC vote if we could start that vote with already having at least one
mentor supporting it via a +1.
Gj
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
So I:
-added a KEYS file with my key (I have it also registered on id.apache.org
,
but it will take time before it propagates):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/KEYS
-and added the release candidate files here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/
incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-alpha/
(please also note the directory structure:
incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-alpha/)
Could someone please check if I did it correctly?
Thanks!
Jan
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
For the IPMC vote, I'd suppose it might be good to actually stage the
release (signed and with hashes):
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#stage
IMO if the only thing we need to change is the filename, it should be
enough to rename before committing to the SVN (the file name will need
to
be changed in the hash file as well/the hash files will need to be
regenerated, although the hash itself should remain the same).
OK, can you do this, Jan?
Gj
Jan
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
[email protected]> wrote:
That means we need to make a new artifact with that name and start a
new
vote thread here for that artifact?
Or do we start a vote thread at the IPMC with the newly named
artifact?
Thanks,
Gj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
[email protected]
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
<[email protected]> wrote:
..."Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with "incubating" ?
As per http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html -
"Release artifacts must include incubating in the final file name"
-Bertrand
