I can try to cresate a list for those Things, but why we Need a list? I think the tickets should be enough to catch them up.
The Problem of this is, I really would like to contribute more and more, but as I said often, when I’m able to fix all my 200 feature requests and Bugs, I will do it by my own, but I’m not. Yes it is hoping from my perspective, that some other developers catches some stuff up to fix them and not me, because of lack of time and lack of Knowledge. So often to say, create a ticket and do it by your own is not the right way. @Neil, I worked serveral years with FF and Firebug I really liked the Tools and I was a fanboy and I developed a plugin for Firefox too, but then I had to Switch to Chrome (Yes I had to, beacuse of my Company, there was a wepapp, where I can’t use FF and firebug, because of the heavy JS part. Yes this is not good at all, but there was no easy way except switching to Chrome). And now I love Chrome very much for the big and usefull Features. I tried to swtiched back to FF, w/o firebug, using the native dev Tools, but they are not so powerful as the Google dev Tools, in my perspective. So we don’t have to copy overy the whole IDE from intelliJ but those killer Features (and of Course Innovation) that other IDEs still have, to be on Point as an real alternative for other developers. I see all those Features and I often think by my self: Wow why I can’t do this in NetBeans? And I know why other devs Switch to IntelliJ, because of those full and rich Features. It is often the same. Cheers Chris Von: Neil C Smith Gesendet: Freitag, 20. April 2018 10:52 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: IntelliJ IDEA vs Netbeans Hi, On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 at 09:28 Christian Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: > It is not that NetBeans Needs to be the first/best DIE on planet, I think > this fight is the same as with IE/Edge/Firefox against Chrome. Chrome is > the best and most used one. It is more that NetBeans should be comparable > with other big IDEs and atm, yes it is comparable but it lacks of Features, > big and small Features that are still missing. > Generally I agree with Geertjan about approach to handling this. However, two broad brush strokes come to mind here - * Firstly, I get the feeling that some things are a case of not being easy to find rather than not available - I'm not sure if that's just me, but every now and again I'll find something that I think has been missing all along. Some of this might be reviewing how things are displayed. * Secondly, I'm not sure competing to play catch up / clone the commercial players is necessarily the best approach. Blatantly missing features, yes. But it would be nice to see some focus on innovation too (if you know some of my FLOSS work you know I'm quite interested in different coding interfaces), and maybe looking for inspiration a little outside the main Java IDE bubble. Oh, and Chrome may be most popular, but the best browser? Give me Firefox tools any time! ;-) Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
