For those not watching commits@nifi I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution is > imminent) > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds unreliable) > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build on) > > Thanks for pushing tony. > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > Update: > > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > revision > > NIFI-61 > > NIFI-812 > > NIFI-980 > > NIFI-1009 > > NIFI-1086 > > NIFI-1133 > > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress > > NIFI-655 > > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being reviewed by > > Tony Kurc > > NIFI-748 > > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, being merged > > in by Tony Kurc > > NIFI-973 > > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button > > NIFI-1054 > > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting revision > > NIFI-1081 > > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch reverted, new > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > > NIFI-1082 > > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark Payne) - not > > sure how to attack this one > > NIFI-1108 > > > > * NEW * > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? but breaking > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > > NIFI-1139 > > > > * NEW * > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. Move to > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > > NIFI-1164 > > > > * NEW * > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no patch. I can > dig > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) > > NIFI-1165 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State Management. > >> > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature Proposals to move > >> out > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting an answer > >> > before > >> > > patch can be completed > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on feature > >> branch > >> > > activity, is close? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - awaiting a patch > >> > marking > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else wants to > take > >> > it > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a bit confused > about > >> > > this > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting review? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812 > confusion) > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!) > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at the ready to > >> > submit > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a candidate for > 0.5.0 > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some bug fixes > >> > awaiting > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed to next > release > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - reviewed, > probably > >> > needs > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear as to > >> status. > >> > Is > >> > > this awaiting review? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems like this > is > >> the > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a priority > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - Awaiting review? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - Awaiting comment > >> from > >> > > Mark Payne. > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - awaiting a merge > to > >> > > master? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - awaiting review? > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - awaiting review > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - awaiting review > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - awaiting review > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker bug > awaiting > >> > > patch > >> > > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review bandwidth > this > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in the jiras. > >> > > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip to 0.5.0? > >> > > > >> > > Tony > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Sean > >> > > >> >
