I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
> For those not watching commits@nifi > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution is > > imminent) > > > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > > > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > > > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds unreliable) > > > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build on) > > > > Thanks for pushing tony. > > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Update: > > > > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > > revision > > > NIFI-61 > > > NIFI-812 > > > NIFI-980 > > > NIFI-1009 > > > NIFI-1086 > > > NIFI-1133 > > > > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress > > > NIFI-655 > > > > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being reviewed > by > > > Tony Kurc > > > NIFI-748 > > > > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, being > merged > > > in by Tony Kurc > > > NIFI-973 > > > > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button > > > NIFI-1054 > > > > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting revision > > > NIFI-1081 > > > > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch reverted, new > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > > > NIFI-1082 > > > > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark Payne) - not > > > sure how to attack this one > > > NIFI-1108 > > > > > > * NEW * > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? but > breaking > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > > > NIFI-1139 > > > > > > * NEW * > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. Move to > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > > > NIFI-1164 > > > > > > * NEW * > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no patch. I can > > dig > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) > > > NIFI-1165 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State Management. > > >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature Proposals to > move > > >> out > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting an > answer > > >> > before > > >> > > patch can be completed > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on feature > > >> branch > > >> > > activity, is close? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - awaiting a patch > > >> > marking > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else wants to > > take > > >> > it > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a bit confused > > about > > >> > > this > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting review? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812 > > confusion) > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!) > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at the ready > to > > >> > submit > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a candidate for > > 0.5.0 > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some bug fixes > > >> > awaiting > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed to next > > release > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - reviewed, > > probably > > >> > needs > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear as to > > >> status. > > >> > Is > > >> > > this awaiting review? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems like this > > is > > >> the > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a priority > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - Awaiting > review? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - Awaiting > comment > > >> from > > >> > > Mark Payne. > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - awaiting a > merge > > to > > >> > > master? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - awaiting > review? > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - awaiting review > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - awaiting review > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - awaiting review > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker bug > > awaiting > > >> > > patch > > >> > > > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review bandwidth > > this > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in the jiras. > > >> > > > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip to > 0.5.0? > > >> > > > > >> > > Tony > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Sean > > >> > > > >> > > >
