Team starting RC2. Joey Frazee noted "I noticed that nifi-docker/dockermaven-stateless/pom.xml and nifi-docker/docker-compose/docker-compose.yml in the source package and tag are still using 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT" while looking at RC1. I have no instructions/guidance on what to do with those as an RM and I've never modified them before. If we're going to keep these in the build, and I would advocate actually that we remove them, then someone needs to determine the whole lifecycle of how to manage/maintain them and document the steps for a RelMgr. The dockerhub module we do have guidance for and they're currently correct.
Thanks On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:14 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Team, > > Will put RC2 for 1.13 back up today hopefully. The fix is in for the > issue that sank the release. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Otto >> >> Truth is we dont know. We cannot readily test with the amazing matrix >> that exists. So we are leaning toward ensuring recent versions work as >> expected. >> >> The goal is java 8 and 11 broadly right now. But these internal changes >> of exception types being used are brutal. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:15 AM Otto Fowler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Joe, >>> >>> I’m started down that road right after I sent this. I’ll update when I >>> know. >>> I _have_ been building nifi with this jdk all along though. >>> >>> If there are jdk minimum requirements, should they be documented ( or >>> are they and I missed it)? >>> >>> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 09:35, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Otto >>> > >>> > I dont know we can keep all variants of Java 8 happy. That one is >>> nearly >>> > three years old. I would say try with something more recent. It has >>> been >>> > pretty shocking how many api changes we have seen across these builds. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:12 AM Otto Fowler <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I’m trying to validate RC-1 and I’m seeing this exception building / >>> >> running tests >>> >> >>> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP >>> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time >>> elapsed: >>> >> 4.499 s <<< FAILURE! - in >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP >>> >> [ERROR] >>> >> >>> testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP) >>> >> Time elapsed: 0.127 s <<< FAILURE! >>> >> java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected exception type thrown; >>> >> expected:<javax.net.ssl.SSLException> but >>> was:<java.net.SocketException> >>> >> at >>> >> >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159) >>> >> Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset >>> >> at >>> >> >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.runTCP(TestListenTCP.java:209) >>> >> at >>> >> >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.lambda$testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided$0(TestListenTCP.java:160) >>> >> at >>> >> >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) >>> >> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec >>> >> Java version: 1.8.0_171, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: >>> >> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_171.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >>> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>> >> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.16", arch: "x86_64", family: “mac" >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 10:31, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> ...in this brutal game of wach a mole another couple brittle tests >>> have >>> >>> emerged on the Java 11 line. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8177 will get that looked >>> >> into. >>> >>> And I'm also seeing if for some reason adding a bit more >>> horsepower/cpu >>> >>> usage to the github tests will help. Things had been very stable for >>> >> quite >>> >>> a while until the update to the latest 11.0.10 azul jdk came out so >>> kind >>> >> of >>> >>> strange the tests became less reliable then. Anyway dont want to >>> initiate >>> >>> the RC until things seem stable otherwise it makes the vote process >>> more >>> >>> difficult and further when the builds dont pass it makes the already >>> >>> difficult task of staying apace with PRs more inivolved. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:19 AM Pierre Villard < >>> >> [email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Awesome, thanks Joe! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 10:16, Joe Witt <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Team, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Ok wow so the issue with build failures that emerged has been >>> resolved >>> >> it >>> >>>>> appears thanks to a lot of effort by exceptionfactory. The other >>> >>>> lingering >>> >>>>> commits/PRs are in and I think most of what folks asked for in this >>> >>>>> thread. I just put in a commit which drops a few older/less common >>> >> nars >>> >>>>> from convenience binary inclusion to get us back under the maximum >>> size >>> >>>>> again. And now I think we can initiate RC1 build for 1.13.0. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> That should be published in the AM. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Thanks >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:40 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Team, >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> There is a TZ handling issue >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8023 that needs a >>> >>>> resolution >>> >>>>>> and there is also a new issue that has emerged on Github >>> Actions/CI >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/actions which is resulting in >>> broken >>> >>>>>> builds. This emerged in the latest Java 11 Azul release and in >>> Github >>> >>>>> CI. >>> >>>>>> I've tried to replicate with no success on a local linux machine >>> with >>> >>>> the >>> >>>>>> exact same JVM/version. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Once these are wrapped I'll initiate the RC. Great work to all >>> >>>> involved >>> >>>>>> in helping get the release candidate this close. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Thanks >>> >>>>>> Joe >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:30 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Team, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> A couple 1.13 tagged items still lingering. Going to either kick >>> >> them >>> >>>>>>> out or merge them and get going. Hopefully an RC today or >>> tomorrow. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:21 AM Mike Thomsen < >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Bug confirmed. Working on a PR now. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:45 AM Mike Thomsen < >>> >> [email protected] >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> This morning, I think I found a serious bug in >>> PutCassandraRecord >>> >>>> WRT >>> >>>>>>>>> writing binary data to Cassandra. I'm debugging now. If it's >>> >>>> really a >>> >>>>>>>>> bug, I'd appreciate it if we could squeak a fix into 1.13. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:54 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Team, >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm going to initiate RM processes for 1.13. I'll be watching >>> >>>>>>>> closely for >>> >>>>>>>>>> currently tagged 1.13 items to include. If anything is >>> dragging >>> >>>>>>>> I'll just >>> >>>>>>>>>> remove it from 1.13 and we'll pick it up later. Other items >>> that >>> >>>>> get >>> >>>>>>>>>> dev/reviewer traction before I cut the RC we can include. I >>> will >>> >>>>>>>>>> *probably/hopefully* start that process first thing tomorrow >>> >>>>> morning. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12348700 >>> >>>> is >>> >>>>>>>> what i'm >>> >>>>>>>>>> working from. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:12 PM Waleed Aibany < >>> >>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did rebase to this old PR >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4167 >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to include it in 1.13.0 >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/01/05 15:03:32, Pierre Villard < >>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Happy new year to everyone, hope you all had a great time. >>> >>>> I'm >>> >>>>>>>> bumping >>> >>>>>>>>>>> this >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> thread up as I think it'd make a lot of sense to release >>> NiFi >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> have a ton of bug fixes and improvements that would be very >>> >>>>>>>> useful for >>> >>>>>>>>>>> our >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> community. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's try to see if there are any blockers for a release and >>> >>>>>>>> start the >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> process: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.13.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 1 déc. 2020 à 14:49, Bryan Bende <[email protected]> >>> >>>> a >>> >>>>>>>> écrit : >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The illegal reflective access warnings are expected when >>> >>>>>>>> running on >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Java >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 11. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The second warning about the provenance repo seems like a >>> >>>>>>>> possible >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue due to some recent refactorings made for stateless, >>> >>>> we >>> >>>>>>>> should >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at that. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bryan >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:58 AM Chris Sampson >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just spotted the following during startup of NiFi >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT on >>> >>>>>>>>>>> my >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine, which might be worth looking at (although >>> >>>>>>>> I've not >>> >>>>>>>>>>> deleted >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-created the binaries in a little while, so I could >>> >>>>>>>> have >>> >>>>>>>>>>> something >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong in my /lib folder or such): >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,382 ERROR [NiFi logging handler] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has >>> >>>>> occurred >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Illegal reflective access by >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> (file:.../nifi-1.13.0-SNAPSHOT/lib/java11/jaxb-impl-2.3.0.jar) >>> to >>> >>>>>>>>>>> method >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the >>> >>>> maintainers >>> >>>>> of >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of >>> >>>>>>>> further >>> >>>>>>>>>>> illegal >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflective access operations >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in >>> >>>> a >>> >>>>>>>> future >>> >>>>>>>>>>> release >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:52,486 WARN [main] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> o.a.n.n.StandardExtensionDiscoveringManager Failed to >>> >>>>>>>> register >>> >>>>>>>>>>> extension >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository >>> >>>> due >>> >>>>>>>> to: >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attempt >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to load >>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository >>> >>>>>>>>>>> from >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi:nifi-provenance-repository-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT >>> but >>> >>>>>>>>>>> that >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> class name is already loaded/registered from >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi:nifi-stateless-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT and >>> >>>>>>>> multiple >>> >>>>>>>>>>> versions >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not supported for this type >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These log messages appear just before the NAR extraction >>> >>>>>>>> logs during >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance startup. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't know whether these are things that should be fixed >>> >>>>>>>> before >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or have already been looked into, but figured I'd >>> >>>>>>>> mention them so >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're at least known about. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chris Sampson* >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT Consultant >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.naimuri.com/> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 18:50, Nissim Shiman >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Nifi Team, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7738 [1] >>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4563 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has already been reviewed/tested by a fellow >>> >>>> contributer >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would greatly appreciate a committer moving this to >>> >>>>> main >>> >>>>>>>> for >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nissim Shiman >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 07:12:12 PM EST, Matt >>> >>>>>>>> Burgess < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged Mike's Cassandra DMC PR, reviewing the >>> >>>>>>>> graph stuff >>> >>>>>>>>>>> now. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a bunch of open PRs [1], I don't think any are >>> >>>>>>>> blockers for >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0 but thought I'd take this opportunity to find >>> >>>> some >>> >>>>>>>>>>> reviewers :) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pulls/mattyb149 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM Phillip Grenier >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't mind >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4554 >>> >>>>>>>> making >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen a couple more instances where people have >>> >>>> created >>> >>>>>>>> custom >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> processors >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work around this PR. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:10 AM Mike Thomsen < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, for most of us (committers and community >>> >>>>>>>> members), it's a >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holiday season so might be good to delay a release >>> >>>> to >>> >>>>>>>> early >>> >>>>>>>>>>> January >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. Just a thought. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mike Thomsen < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4638 - This >>> >>>> is >>> >>>>>>>> a big >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph functionality, and I want to give him a >>> >>>>> chance >>> >>>>>>>> to get >>> >>>>>>>>>>> his >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> first >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution in with 1.13 (we may have some more >>> >>>> of >>> >>>>>>>> his work >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open source). >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt's also reviewing some of my Cassandra and >>> >>>>> graph >>> >>>>>>>> tickets >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't call those **blockers**, but having >>> >>>> the >>> >>>>>>>> Cassandra >>> >>>>>>>>>>> DMC >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fully >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fleshed out would be nice. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:10 AM Otto Fowler < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7795 >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4656 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7761 >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4513 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-2072 >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4384 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Pierre Villard < >>> >>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply: [email protected] < >>> >>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>> < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: November 26, 2020 at 04:55:56 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> >>>> < >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache NiFi >>> >>>> 1.13.0 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi community, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting a discussion thread around the release >>> >>>>> of >>> >>>>>>>> NiFi >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite a lot of significant improvements and >>> >>>>>>>> features since >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12.1 - I see 143 JIRAs with 1.13.0 as the fix >>> >>>>>>>> version. I >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense to consider a new release. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share here the JIRAs with opened pull >>> >>>>>>>> requests that >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at to make this release happen. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
