nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-stateless is gone.  I think you
just need to clean your repo.

The other two I think are defunct and I'll delete right now.

Thanks

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:56 PM Mark Bean <[email protected]> wrote:

> Today, I also noticed that the following modules still have code in them.
> However, they are not listed as a module in the corresponding pom.xml.
>
> nifi-docker/docker-compose
> nifi-docker/dockermaven-stateless
> nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-stateless
>
> Is this dead code that should simply be removed? Also, I did not email this
> out yet because I did not finish searching the codebase for other such
> "unused" code.
>
> At a minimum, as best I can tell, the above can be removed entirely.
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:33 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Team
> >
> > starting RC2.  Joey Frazee noted "I noticed that
> > nifi-docker/dockermaven-stateless/pom.xml
> > and nifi-docker/docker-compose/docker-compose.yml in the source package
> and
> > tag are still using 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT" while looking at RC1.  I have no
> > instructions/guidance on what to do with those as an RM and I've never
> > modified them before.  If we're going to keep these in the build, and I
> > would advocate actually that we remove them, then someone needs to
> > determine the whole lifecycle of how to manage/maintain them and
> > document the steps for a RelMgr.  The dockerhub module we do have
> guidance
> > for and they're currently correct.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:14 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Team,
> > >
> > > Will put RC2 for 1.13 back up today hopefully.  The fix is in for the
> > > issue that sank the release.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Otto
> > >>
> > >> Truth is we dont know.  We cannot readily test with the amazing matrix
> > >> that exists.  So we are leaning toward ensuring recent versions work
> as
> > >> expected.
> > >>
> > >> The goal is java 8 and 11 broadly right now. But these internal
> changes
> > >> of exception types being used are brutal.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:15 AM Otto Fowler <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks Joe,
> > >>>
> > >>> I’m started down that road right after I sent this.  I’ll update
> when I
> > >>> know.
> > >>> I _have_ been building nifi with this jdk all along though.
> > >>>
> > >>> If there are jdk minimum requirements, should they be documented ( or
> > >>> are they and I missed it)?
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 09:35, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Otto
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I dont know we can keep all variants of Java 8 happy.  That one is
> > >>> nearly
> > >>> > three years old.  I would say try with something more recent.  It
> has
> > >>> been
> > >>> > pretty shocking how many api changes we have seen across these
> > builds.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:12 AM Otto Fowler <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> I’m trying to validate RC-1 and I’m seeing this exception
> building /
> > >>> >> running tests
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP
> > >>> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > >>> elapsed:
> > >>> >> 4.499 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP
> > >>> >> [ERROR]
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP)
> > >>> >> Time elapsed: 0.127 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > >>> >> java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected exception type thrown;
> > >>> >> expected:<javax.net.ssl.SSLException> but
> > >>> was:<java.net.SocketException>
> > >>> >>        at
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159)
> > >>> >> Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
> > >>> >>        at
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.runTCP(TestListenTCP.java:209)
> > >>> >>        at
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.lambda$testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided$0(TestListenTCP.java:160)
> > >>> >>        at
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159)
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
> > >>> >> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec
> > >>> >> Java version: 1.8.0_171, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
> > >>> >>
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_171.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> > >>> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > >>> >> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.16", arch: "x86_64", family:
> “mac"
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 10:31, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> ...in this brutal game of wach a mole another couple brittle
> tests
> > >>> have
> > >>> >>> emerged on the Java 11 line.
> > >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8177 will get that
> > looked
> > >>> >> into.
> > >>> >>> And I'm also seeing if for some reason adding a bit more
> > >>> horsepower/cpu
> > >>> >>> usage to the github tests will help.  Things had been very stable
> > for
> > >>> >> quite
> > >>> >>> a while until the update to the latest 11.0.10 azul jdk came out
> so
> > >>> kind
> > >>> >> of
> > >>> >>> strange the tests became less reliable then. Anyway dont want to
> > >>> initiate
> > >>> >>> the RC until things seem stable otherwise it makes the vote
> process
> > >>> more
> > >>> >>> difficult and further when the builds dont pass it makes the
> > already
> > >>> >>> difficult task of staying apace with PRs more inivolved.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Thanks
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:19 AM Pierre Villard <
> > >>> >> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>> Awesome, thanks Joe!
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 10:16, Joe Witt <[email protected]> a
> > >>> écrit :
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Team,
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Ok wow so the issue with build failures that emerged has been
> > >>> resolved
> > >>> >> it
> > >>> >>>>> appears thanks to a lot of effort by exceptionfactory.  The
> other
> > >>> >>>> lingering
> > >>> >>>>> commits/PRs are in and I think most of what folks asked for in
> > this
> > >>> >>>>> thread.  I just put in a commit which drops a few older/less
> > common
> > >>> >> nars
> > >>> >>>>> from convenience binary inclusion to get us back under the
> > maximum
> > >>> size
> > >>> >>>>> again.  And now I think we can initiate RC1 build for 1.13.0.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> That should be published in the AM.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Thanks
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:40 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Team,
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> There is a TZ handling issue
> > >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8023 that needs a
> > >>> >>>> resolution
> > >>> >>>>>> and there is also a new issue that has emerged on Github
> > >>> Actions/CI
> > >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/actions which is resulting in
> > >>> broken
> > >>> >>>>>> builds.  This emerged in the latest Java 11 Azul release and
> in
> > >>> Github
> > >>> >>>>> CI.
> > >>> >>>>>> I've tried to replicate with no success on a local linux
> machine
> > >>> with
> > >>> >>>> the
> > >>> >>>>>> exact same JVM/version.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Once these are wrapped I'll initiate the RC.  Great work to
> all
> > >>> >>>> involved
> > >>> >>>>>> in helping get the release candidate this close.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Thanks
> > >>> >>>>>> Joe
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:30 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>> Team,
> > >>> >>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>> A couple 1.13 tagged items still lingering.  Going to either
> > kick
> > >>> >> them
> > >>> >>>>>>> out or merge them and get going.  Hopefully an RC today or
> > >>> tomorrow.
> > >>> >>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>> >>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:21 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>> Bug confirmed. Working on a PR now.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:45 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > >>> >> [email protected]
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>> This morning, I think I found a serious bug in
> > >>> PutCassandraRecord
> > >>> >>>> WRT
> > >>> >>>>>>>>> writing binary data to Cassandra. I'm debugging now. If
> it's
> > >>> >>>> really a
> > >>> >>>>>>>>> bug, I'd appreciate it if we could squeak a fix into 1.13.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:54 AM Joe Witt <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > >>> >>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> Team,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm going to initiate RM processes for 1.13. I'll be
> > watching
> > >>> >>>>>>>> closely for
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> currently tagged 1.13 items to include.  If anything is
> > >>> dragging
> > >>> >>>>>>>> I'll just
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> remove it from 1.13 and we'll pick it up later.  Other
> items
> > >>> that
> > >>> >>>>> get
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> dev/reviewer traction before I cut the RC we can
> include.  I
> > >>> will
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> *probably/hopefully* start that process first thing
> tomorrow
> > >>> >>>>> morning.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12348700
> > >>> >>>> is
> > >>> >>>>>>>> what i'm
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> working from.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:12 PM Waleed Aibany <
> > >>> >>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did rebase to this old PR
> > >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4167
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to include it in 1.13.0
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/01/05 15:03:32, Pierre Villard <
> > >>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Happy new year to everyone, hope you all had a great
> time.
> > >>> >>>> I'm
> > >>> >>>>>>>> bumping
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> thread up as I think it'd make a lot of sense to release
> > >>> NiFi
> > >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> have a ton of bug fixes and improvements that would be
> > very
> > >>> >>>>>>>> useful for
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> our
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> community.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's try to see if there are any blockers for a release
> > and
> > >>> >>>>>>>> start the
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> process:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.13.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 1 déc. 2020 à 14:49, Bryan Bende <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>> a
> > >>> >>>>>>>> écrit :
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The illegal reflective access warnings are expected
> when
> > >>> >>>>>>>> running on
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Java
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The second warning about the provenance repo seems
> like a
> > >>> >>>>>>>> possible
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue due to some recent refactorings made for
> stateless,
> > >>> >>>> we
> > >>> >>>>>>>> should
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at that.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bryan
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:58 AM Chris Sampson
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just spotted the following during startup of NiFi
> > >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT on
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> my
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine, which might be worth looking at
> (although
> > >>> >>>>>>>> I've not
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> deleted
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-created the binaries in a little while, so I
> > could
> > >>> >>>>>>>> have
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> something
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong in my /lib folder or such):
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,382 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has
> > >>> >>>>> occurred
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> (file:.../nifi-1.13.0-SNAPSHOT/lib/java11/jaxb-impl-2.3.0.jar)
> > >>> to
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> method
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> > >>> java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int)
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the
> > >>> >>>> maintainers
> > >>> >>>>> of
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings
> of
> > >>> >>>>>>>> further
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> illegal
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflective access operations
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied
> in
> > >>> >>>> a
> > >>> >>>>>>>> future
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:52,486 WARN [main]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> o.a.n.n.StandardExtensionDiscoveringManager Failed to
> > >>> >>>>>>>> register
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> extension
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository
> > >>> >>>> due
> > >>> >>>>>>>> to:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attempt
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to load
> > >>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> from
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> org.apache.nifi:nifi-provenance-repository-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT
> > >>> but
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> class name is already loaded/registered from
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi:nifi-stateless-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT and
> > >>> >>>>>>>> multiple
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> versions
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not supported for this type
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These log messages appear just before the NAR
> extraction
> > >>> >>>>>>>> logs during
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance startup.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't know whether these are things that should be
> fixed
> > >>> >>>>>>>> before
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or have already been looked into, but figured I'd
> > >>> >>>>>>>> mention them so
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're at least known about.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chris Sampson*
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT Consultant
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.naimuri.com/>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 18:50, Nissim Shiman
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Nifi Team,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7738 [1]
> > >>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4563
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has already been reviewed/tested by a fellow
> > >>> >>>> contributer
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would greatly appreciate a committer moving this to
> > >>> >>>>> main
> > >>> >>>>>>>> for
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nissim Shiman
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 07:12:12 PM EST, Matt
> > >>> >>>>>>>> Burgess <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged Mike's Cassandra DMC PR, reviewing the
> > >>> >>>>>>>> graph stuff
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> now.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a bunch of open PRs [1], I don't think any are
> > >>> >>>>>>>> blockers for
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0 but thought I'd take this opportunity to find
> > >>> >>>> some
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> reviewers :)
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pulls/mattyb149
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM Phillip Grenier
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't mind
> > >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4554
> > >>> >>>>>>>> making
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen a couple more instances where people have
> > >>> >>>> created
> > >>> >>>>>>>> custom
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> processors
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work around this PR.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:10 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, for most of us (committers and community
> > >>> >>>>>>>> members), it's a
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holiday season so might be good to delay a release
> > >>> >>>> to
> > >>> >>>>>>>> early
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> January
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. Just a thought.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4638 - This
> > >>> >>>> is
> > >>> >>>>>>>> a big
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph functionality, and I want to give him a
> > >>> >>>>> chance
> > >>> >>>>>>>> to get
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> his
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> first
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution in with 1.13 (we may have some more
> > >>> >>>> of
> > >>> >>>>>>>> his work
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open source).
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt's also reviewing some of my Cassandra and
> > >>> >>>>> graph
> > >>> >>>>>>>> tickets
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't call those **blockers**, but having
> > >>> >>>> the
> > >>> >>>>>>>> Cassandra
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> DMC
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fully
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fleshed out would be nice.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:10 AM Otto Fowler <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7795
> > >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4656
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7761
> > >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4513
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-2072
> > >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4384
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Pierre Villard <
> > >>> >>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply: [email protected] <
> > >>> >>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>> <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: November 26, 2020 at 04:55:56
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>>> <
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:  [DISCUSS] Release of Apache NiFi
> > >>> >>>> 1.13.0
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting a discussion thread around the release
> > >>> >>>>> of
> > >>> >>>>>>>> NiFi
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite a lot of significant improvements and
> > >>> >>>>>>>> features since
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12.1 - I see 143 JIRAs with 1.13.0 as the fix
> > >>> >>>>>>>> version. I
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense to consider a new release.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share here the JIRAs with opened pull
> > >>> >>>>>>>> requests that
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at to make this release happen.
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
>

Reply via email to