Today, I also noticed that the following modules still have code in them.
However, they are not listed as a module in the corresponding pom.xml.

nifi-docker/docker-compose
nifi-docker/dockermaven-stateless
nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-stateless

Is this dead code that should simply be removed? Also, I did not email this
out yet because I did not finish searching the codebase for other such
"unused" code.

At a minimum, as best I can tell, the above can be removed entirely.

-Mark



On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:33 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Team
>
> starting RC2.  Joey Frazee noted "I noticed that
> nifi-docker/dockermaven-stateless/pom.xml
> and nifi-docker/docker-compose/docker-compose.yml in the source package and
> tag are still using 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT" while looking at RC1.  I have no
> instructions/guidance on what to do with those as an RM and I've never
> modified them before.  If we're going to keep these in the build, and I
> would advocate actually that we remove them, then someone needs to
> determine the whole lifecycle of how to manage/maintain them and
> document the steps for a RelMgr.  The dockerhub module we do have guidance
> for and they're currently correct.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:14 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Will put RC2 for 1.13 back up today hopefully.  The fix is in for the
> > issue that sank the release.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Otto
> >>
> >> Truth is we dont know.  We cannot readily test with the amazing matrix
> >> that exists.  So we are leaning toward ensuring recent versions work as
> >> expected.
> >>
> >> The goal is java 8 and 11 broadly right now. But these internal changes
> >> of exception types being used are brutal.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:15 AM Otto Fowler <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Joe,
> >>>
> >>> I’m started down that road right after I sent this.  I’ll update when I
> >>> know.
> >>> I _have_ been building nifi with this jdk all along though.
> >>>
> >>> If there are jdk minimum requirements, should they be documented ( or
> >>> are they and I missed it)?
> >>>
> >>> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 09:35, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Otto
> >>> >
> >>> > I dont know we can keep all variants of Java 8 happy.  That one is
> >>> nearly
> >>> > three years old.  I would say try with something more recent.  It has
> >>> been
> >>> > pretty shocking how many api changes we have seen across these
> builds.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:12 AM Otto Fowler <[email protected]
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I’m trying to validate RC-1 and I’m seeing this exception building /
> >>> >> running tests
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP
> >>> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> >>> elapsed:
> >>> >> 4.499 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> >>> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP
> >>> >> [ERROR]
> >>> >>
> >>>
> testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP)
> >>> >> Time elapsed: 0.127 s  <<< FAILURE!
> >>> >> java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected exception type thrown;
> >>> >> expected:<javax.net.ssl.SSLException> but
> >>> was:<java.net.SocketException>
> >>> >>        at
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159)
> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
> >>> >>        at
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.runTCP(TestListenTCP.java:209)
> >>> >>        at
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.lambda$testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided$0(TestListenTCP.java:160)
> >>> >>        at
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestListenTCP.testTLSClientAuthRequiredAndClientCertNotProvided(TestListenTCP.java:159)
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
> >>> >> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec
> >>> >> Java version: 1.8.0_171, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
> >>> >> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_171.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> >>> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> >>> >> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.16", arch: "x86_64", family: “mac"
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 10:31, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> ...in this brutal game of wach a mole another couple brittle tests
> >>> have
> >>> >>> emerged on the Java 11 line.
> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8177 will get that
> looked
> >>> >> into.
> >>> >>> And I'm also seeing if for some reason adding a bit more
> >>> horsepower/cpu
> >>> >>> usage to the github tests will help.  Things had been very stable
> for
> >>> >> quite
> >>> >>> a while until the update to the latest 11.0.10 azul jdk came out so
> >>> kind
> >>> >> of
> >>> >>> strange the tests became less reliable then. Anyway dont want to
> >>> initiate
> >>> >>> the RC until things seem stable otherwise it makes the vote process
> >>> more
> >>> >>> difficult and further when the builds dont pass it makes the
> already
> >>> >>> difficult task of staying apace with PRs more inivolved.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Thanks
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:19 AM Pierre Villard <
> >>> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Awesome, thanks Joe!
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 10:16, Joe Witt <[email protected]> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> Team,
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Ok wow so the issue with build failures that emerged has been
> >>> resolved
> >>> >> it
> >>> >>>>> appears thanks to a lot of effort by exceptionfactory.  The other
> >>> >>>> lingering
> >>> >>>>> commits/PRs are in and I think most of what folks asked for in
> this
> >>> >>>>> thread.  I just put in a commit which drops a few older/less
> common
> >>> >> nars
> >>> >>>>> from convenience binary inclusion to get us back under the
> maximum
> >>> size
> >>> >>>>> again.  And now I think we can initiate RC1 build for 1.13.0.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> That should be published in the AM.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Thanks
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:40 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Team,
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> There is a TZ handling issue
> >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8023 that needs a
> >>> >>>> resolution
> >>> >>>>>> and there is also a new issue that has emerged on Github
> >>> Actions/CI
> >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/actions which is resulting in
> >>> broken
> >>> >>>>>> builds.  This emerged in the latest Java 11 Azul release and in
> >>> Github
> >>> >>>>> CI.
> >>> >>>>>> I've tried to replicate with no success on a local linux machine
> >>> with
> >>> >>>> the
> >>> >>>>>> exact same JVM/version.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Once these are wrapped I'll initiate the RC.  Great work to all
> >>> >>>> involved
> >>> >>>>>> in helping get the release candidate this close.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>> >>>>>> Joe
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:30 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Team,
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> A couple 1.13 tagged items still lingering.  Going to either
> kick
> >>> >> them
> >>> >>>>>>> out or merge them and get going.  Hopefully an RC today or
> >>> tomorrow.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:21 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Bug confirmed. Working on a PR now.
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:45 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> >> [email protected]
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> This morning, I think I found a serious bug in
> >>> PutCassandraRecord
> >>> >>>> WRT
> >>> >>>>>>>>> writing binary data to Cassandra. I'm debugging now. If it's
> >>> >>>> really a
> >>> >>>>>>>>> bug, I'd appreciate it if we could squeak a fix into 1.13.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:54 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Team,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm going to initiate RM processes for 1.13. I'll be
> watching
> >>> >>>>>>>> closely for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> currently tagged 1.13 items to include.  If anything is
> >>> dragging
> >>> >>>>>>>> I'll just
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> remove it from 1.13 and we'll pick it up later.  Other items
> >>> that
> >>> >>>>> get
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> dev/reviewer traction before I cut the RC we can include.  I
> >>> will
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> *probably/hopefully* start that process first thing tomorrow
> >>> >>>>> morning.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12348700
> >>> >>>> is
> >>> >>>>>>>> what i'm
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> working from.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:12 PM Waleed Aibany <
> >>> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did rebase to this old PR
> >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4167
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to include it in 1.13.0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/01/05 15:03:32, Pierre Villard <
> >>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Happy new year to everyone, hope you all had a great time.
> >>> >>>> I'm
> >>> >>>>>>>> bumping
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> thread up as I think it'd make a lot of sense to release
> >>> NiFi
> >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> have a ton of bug fixes and improvements that would be
> very
> >>> >>>>>>>> useful for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> our
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> community.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's try to see if there are any blockers for a release
> and
> >>> >>>>>>>> start the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> process:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.13.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 1 déc. 2020 à 14:49, Bryan Bende <
> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>> a
> >>> >>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The illegal reflective access warnings are expected when
> >>> >>>>>>>> running on
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Java
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The second warning about the provenance repo seems like a
> >>> >>>>>>>> possible
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue due to some recent refactorings made for stateless,
> >>> >>>> we
> >>> >>>>>>>> should
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at that.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bryan
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:58 AM Chris Sampson
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just spotted the following during startup of NiFi
> >>> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT on
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine, which might be worth looking at (although
> >>> >>>>>>>> I've not
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> deleted
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-created the binaries in a little while, so I
> could
> >>> >>>>>>>> have
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> something
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong in my /lib folder or such):
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,382 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has
> >>> >>>>> occurred
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> (file:.../nifi-1.13.0-SNAPSHOT/lib/java11/jaxb-impl-2.3.0.jar)
> >>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int)
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the
> >>> >>>> maintainers
> >>> >>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of
> >>> >>>>>>>> further
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> illegal
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflective access operations
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:48,383 ERROR [NiFi logging handler]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.StdErr
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in
> >>> >>>> a
> >>> >>>>>>>> future
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020-12-01 08:52:52,486 WARN [main]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> o.a.n.n.StandardExtensionDiscoveringManager Failed to
> >>> >>>>>>>> register
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> extension
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository
> >>> >>>> due
> >>> >>>>>>>> to:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attempt
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to load
> >>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi.provenance.VolatileProvenanceRepository
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi:nifi-provenance-repository-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>> but
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> class name is already loaded/registered from
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.nifi:nifi-stateless-nar:1.13.0-SNAPSHOT and
> >>> >>>>>>>> multiple
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> versions
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not supported for this type
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These log messages appear just before the NAR extraction
> >>> >>>>>>>> logs during
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance startup.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't know whether these are things that should be fixed
> >>> >>>>>>>> before
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or have already been looked into, but figured I'd
> >>> >>>>>>>> mention them so
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're at least known about.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chris Sampson*
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT Consultant
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.naimuri.com/>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 18:50, Nissim Shiman
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Nifi Team,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7738 [1]
> >>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4563
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has already been reviewed/tested by a fellow
> >>> >>>> contributer
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would greatly appreciate a committer moving this to
> >>> >>>>> main
> >>> >>>>>>>> for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nissim Shiman
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 07:12:12 PM EST, Matt
> >>> >>>>>>>> Burgess <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged Mike's Cassandra DMC PR, reviewing the
> >>> >>>>>>>> graph stuff
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a bunch of open PRs [1], I don't think any are
> >>> >>>>>>>> blockers for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0 but thought I'd take this opportunity to find
> >>> >>>> some
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> reviewers :)
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pulls/mattyb149
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM Phillip Grenier
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't mind
> >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4554
> >>> >>>>>>>> making
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen a couple more instances where people have
> >>> >>>> created
> >>> >>>>>>>> custom
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> processors
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work around this PR.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:10 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, for most of us (committers and community
> >>> >>>>>>>> members), it's a
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holiday season so might be good to delay a release
> >>> >>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>> early
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> January
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. Just a thought.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4638 - This
> >>> >>>> is
> >>> >>>>>>>> a big
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph functionality, and I want to give him a
> >>> >>>>> chance
> >>> >>>>>>>> to get
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> his
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> first
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution in with 1.13 (we may have some more
> >>> >>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>> his work
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open source).
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt's also reviewing some of my Cassandra and
> >>> >>>>> graph
> >>> >>>>>>>> tickets
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't call those **blockers**, but having
> >>> >>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>> Cassandra
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> DMC
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fully
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fleshed out would be nice.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:10 AM Otto Fowler <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7795
> >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4656
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-7761
> >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4513
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NIFI-2072
> >>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4384
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Pierre Villard <
> >>> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply: [email protected] <
> >>> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>> <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: November 26, 2020 at 04:55:56
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> >>> >>>> <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:  [DISCUSS] Release of Apache NiFi
> >>> >>>> 1.13.0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting a discussion thread around the release
> >>> >>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>> NiFi
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0. We
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite a lot of significant improvements and
> >>> >>>>>>>> features since
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12.1 - I see 143 JIRAs with 1.13.0 as the fix
> >>> >>>>>>>> version. I
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense to consider a new release.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share here the JIRAs with opened pull
> >>> >>>>>>>> requests that
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at to make this release happen.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to