Ferenc, Thanks for summarizing the status of key issues.
With the dependency upgrades addressed and the other noted pull requests merged, the support branch seems to be in a good position for a release candidate build. Regards, David Handermann On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 6:52 AM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > let's recap on the current status. > > * These tickets are still in progress, but seem to get close to merge > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13744 - > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9285 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776 - > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9286 > > * As discussed I went through the dependencies, and updated as much as I > could. > Details are on the Jira, but in a nutshell: went through the commits from > the 2024 year which contain dependency upgrades. These commits are from the > 1.26 and the 1.27 release period, so the list should reflect well which > dependencies are usually upgraded from release to release. > Unfortunately not all dependency upgrades were feasible due to various > reasons. If I remember correctly this was the reason why those components > were deprecated and removed from the NiFi 2.x line. > *This PR needs to be reviewed.* > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13836 - > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9340 > > * As requested I created a Jira for backporting NIFI-13529. The commit > couldn't be simply cherry-picked to support/1.x due to major refactorings > on the 2.x line. > *This PR needs to be reviewed.* > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13837 - > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9341 > > Regards > Ferenc > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:31 AM Mathew Kiprop <mathewkipro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > Is this issue[1] backported to the 1.x line and will it be available in > > 1.28.0? I haven't seen it tracked here [2] > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9066 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883 > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:33 PM David Handermann < > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Ferenc, > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing the dependency upgrades. > > > > > > Reviewing the issues assigned to release version 1.28.0 [1] there are > > > several new Processors, and additional features, so that seems the > > > logical next step for a new version. > > > > > > We are also approaching readiness for the 2.0.0 release, but I will > > > start a separate thread on that when ready. > > > > > > Regards, > > > David Handermann > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883 > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:26 AM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the heads up. I agree with the importance of dependency > > > upgrades. > > > > > > > > I will go through the list of dependencies, and update whichever is > > > > feasible, particularly the ones with critical or high CVE ranks. > > > > This will also give some time buffer for the community to finish the > > > > Jiras/PRs in progress. > > > > > > > > Also if the community thinks that the current feature set / dependency > > > > upgrades are not enough for a full-fledged release, we can go with > > > 1.27.1. > > > > > > > > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ferenc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:37 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I just pushed a bunch of updates to 13776. Apologies for the delay. > > > Been > > > > > dealing with a lot of stuff this week that kept pulling me away. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 10:13 AM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's recap on the status. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm aware of four tickets we are waiting for to get into the NiFi > > > 1.28 > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776: this is > > > currently > > > > > > being reviewed on the 2.x line. My guess is once it's been > > merged > > > into > > > > > > main, we can merge the PR for the 1.x line as well > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776: this is a > > 1.x > > > > > only > > > > > > bugfix, and being reviewed > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13765: Jira is > > > closed, > > > > > it > > > > > > turned out the issue does not impact the 1.x line > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13782: it seems > > it's > > > > > more > > > > > > complex than expected and needs additional efforts to complete > > > > > > > > > > > > In summary I think we should wait for the first two tickets as > > those > > > are > > > > > > near to completion, then kick off the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Is there anything else we should add to the > > > release? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Ferenc Kis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:51 PM Shane Ardell < > > > shane.m.ard...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm also working on > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13765. > > > > > > > Although not critical, it would be nice to have this in the next > > > > > release. > > > > > > > The fix is simple and I should have a PR open by tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:23 AM Ferenc Kis < > > > briansolo1...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it is worth to wait for both fixes as those seem to fix > > > > > > critical > > > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's reiterate on this next week > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Ferenc Kis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:40 AM Dan S <dsti...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also working on NIFI-13744 > > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13744> which is > > a > > > bug > > > > > in > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > ExcelReader handles dates, times and timestamps. I am also > > > > > targeting > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > fix by the end of the week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 4:31 PM Mike Thomsen < > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found a serious bug in how copys3object handles large > > > files and > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > working on a fix. I should have it ready by the end of the > > > week, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > without it the processor is broken on large file copy > > > actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 10:41 AM, Lucas Ottersbach < > > > > > > > > > > lucas.ottersb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Ferenc, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you for starting the discussion. It sounds like a > > > > > > reasonable > > > > > > > > > amount > > > > > > > > > > > of time has passed and changes were introduced since the > > > last > > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > Waiting for the one pending PR sound reasonable. > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely a +1 from my side. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lucas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 18. > > > Sept. > > > > > > > 2024, > > > > > > > > > > 12:33: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release > > > of > > > > > NiFi > > > > > > > > 1.x. > > > > > > > > > > >> Since the release of Apache NiFi 1.27, several important > > > bugs > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > including > > > > > > > > > > >> NIFI-13675 [2] have been resolved, and there have been a > > > > > handful > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > >> features, improvements and dependency updates [3] added > > > to the > > > > > > > > > nifi-1.x > > > > > > > > > > >> branch. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Currently there is only one ticket waiting for review, > > > all the > > > > > > > > others > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > >> merged, > > > > > > > > > > >> so it seems we are in a good position to kick off a > > > release > > > > > for > > > > > > > NiFi > > > > > > > > > > 1.28.0 > > > > > > > > > > >> [4]. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I would be glad to handle the Release Manager > > > responsibilities > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >> 1.28.0 > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Do you agree it is time for a new release or do you see > > > > > > additional > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > >> we should make? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > >> Ferenc Kis > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13742?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.28.0 > > > > > > > > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13675 > > > > > > > > > > >> [3] > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13727?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.28.0%20AND%20type%20!%3D%20BUG > > > > > > > > > > >> [4] > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883 > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
