+1 I was informed that fix was backported already under a separate Jira and
PR, so I'm good with going forward.

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:47 AM Matt Burgess <mattyb...@apache.org> wrote:

> As with 2.0.0, if we can backport [1] into 1.28 I think we should.
>
> Thanks Ferenc!
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9273
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:11 AM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> all of the remaining tickets are now merged, so we can proceed with the
>> release.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883
>>
>> Please let me know if there are still any tickets in progress which could
>> be blockers for this release.
>>
>> I plan to start the release candidate process before the end of this
>> week, if there are no objections.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ferenc
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:47 PM David Handermann <
>> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Ferenc,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the reply! I will continue reviewing that soon to get
>> > things ready for the release.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > David Handermann
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:51 PM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thanks David!
>> > >
>> > > We are still waiting for
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13744,
>> > > it seems to be important to get into 1.28
>> > > Once it is merged and backported to 1.28, I plan to start to release
>> > process
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > Ferenc
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:16 PM David Handermann <
>> > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Ferenc,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for summarizing the status of key issues.
>> > > >
>> > > > With the dependency upgrades addressed and the other noted pull
>> > > > requests merged, the support branch seems to be in a good position
>> for
>> > > > a release candidate build.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > David Handermann
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 6:52 AM Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi Team,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > let's recap on the current status.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > * These tickets are still in progress, but seem to get close to
>> merge
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13744 -
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9285
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776 -
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9286
>> > > > >
>> > > > > * As discussed I went through the dependencies, and updated as
>> much
>> > as I
>> > > > > could.
>> > > > > Details are on the Jira, but in a nutshell: went through the
>> commits
>> > from
>> > > > > the 2024 year which contain dependency upgrades. These commits are
>> > from
>> > > > the
>> > > > > 1.26 and the 1.27 release period, so the list should reflect well
>> > which
>> > > > > dependencies are usually upgraded from release to release.
>> > > > > Unfortunately not all dependency upgrades were feasible due to
>> > various
>> > > > > reasons. If I remember correctly this was the reason why those
>> > components
>> > > > > were deprecated and removed from the NiFi 2.x line.
>> > > > > *This PR needs to be reviewed.*
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13836 -
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9340
>> > > > >
>> > > > > * As requested I created a Jira for backporting NIFI-13529. The
>> > commit
>> > > > > couldn't be simply cherry-picked to support/1.x due to major
>> > refactorings
>> > > > > on the 2.x line.
>> > > > > *This PR needs to be reviewed.*
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13837 -
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9341
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > > Ferenc
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:31 AM Mathew Kiprop <
>> > mathewkipro...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi team,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Is this issue[1] backported to the 1.x line and will it be
>> > available in
>> > > > > > 1.28.0? I haven't seen it tracked here [2]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9066
>> > > > > > [2]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:33 PM David Handermann <
>> > > > > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ferenc,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing the dependency upgrades.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Reviewing the issues assigned to release version 1.28.0 [1]
>> > there are
>> > > > > > > several new Processors, and additional features, so that seems
>> > the
>> > > > > > > logical next step for a new version.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > We are also approaching readiness for the 2.0.0 release, but I
>> > will
>> > > > > > > start a separate thread on that when ready.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > > David Handermann
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [1]
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:26 AM Ferenc Kis <
>> > briansolo1...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Joe,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for the heads up. I agree with the importance of
>> > dependency
>> > > > > > > upgrades.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I will go through the list of dependencies, and update
>> > whichever is
>> > > > > > > > feasible, particularly the ones with critical or high CVE
>> > ranks.
>> > > > > > > > This will also give some time buffer for the community to
>> > finish
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > Jiras/PRs in progress.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Also if the community thinks that the current feature set /
>> > > > dependency
>> > > > > > > > upgrades are not enough for a full-fledged release, we can
>> go
>> > with
>> > > > > > > 1.27.1.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > > > Ferenc
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:37 PM Mike Thomsen <
>> > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I just pushed a bunch of updates to 13776. Apologies for
>> the
>> > > > delay.
>> > > > > > > Been
>> > > > > > > > > dealing with a lot of stuff this week that kept pulling me
>> > away.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 10:13 AM Ferenc Kis <
>> > > > briansolo1...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Team,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Let's recap on the status.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I'm aware of four tickets we are waiting for to get into
>> > the
>> > > > NiFi
>> > > > > > > 1.28
>> > > > > > > > > > release.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776:
>> > this is
>> > > > > > > currently
>> > > > > > > > > >    being reviewed on the 2.x line. My guess is once it's
>> > been
>> > > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > into
>> > > > > > > > > >    main, we can merge the PR for the 1.x line as well
>> > > > > > > > > >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13776:
>> > this
>> > > > is a
>> > > > > > 1.x
>> > > > > > > > > only
>> > > > > > > > > >    bugfix, and being reviewed
>> > > > > > > > > >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13765:
>> > Jira is
>> > > > > > > closed,
>> > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > >    turned out the issue does not impact the 1.x line
>> > > > > > > > > >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13782:
>> it
>> > > > seems
>> > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > > > more
>> > > > > > > > > >    complex than expected and needs additional efforts to
>> > > > complete
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > In summary I think we should wait for the first two
>> > tickets as
>> > > > > > those
>> > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > > near to completion, then kick off the release.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Is there anything else we should add
>> to
>> > the
>> > > > > > > release?
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > > > > > Ferenc Kis
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:51 PM Shane Ardell <
>> > > > > > > shane.m.ard...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > I'm also working on
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13765.
>> > > > > > > > > > > Although not critical, it would be nice to have this
>> in
>> > the
>> > > > next
>> > > > > > > > > release.
>> > > > > > > > > > > The fix is simple and I should have a PR open by
>> > tomorrow.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > > > > Shane
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:23 AM Ferenc Kis <
>> > > > > > > briansolo1...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your feedback
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > I think it is worth to wait for both fixes as those
>> > seem
>> > > > to fix
>> > > > > > > > > > critical
>> > > > > > > > > > > > issues
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Let's reiterate on this next week
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Ferenc Kis
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:40 AM Dan S <
>> > dsti...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also working on NIFI-13744
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13744
>> >
>> > > > which is
>> > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > bug
>> > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > how
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ExcelReader handles dates, times and timestamps.
>> I am
>> > > > also
>> > > > > > > > > targeting
>> > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > fix by the end of the week.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 4:31 PM Mike Thomsen <
>> > > > > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found a serious bug in how copys3object
>> handles
>> > large
>> > > > > > > files and
>> > > > > > > > > > am
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > working on a fix. I should have it ready by the
>> > end of
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > week,
>> > > > > > > > > > but
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > without it the processor is broken on large file
>> > copy
>> > > > > > > actions.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 10:41 AM, Lucas
>> Ottersbach <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > lucas.ottersb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Ferenc,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you for starting the discussion. It
>> sounds
>> > > > like a
>> > > > > > > > > > reasonable
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > amount
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of time has passed and changes were introduced
>> > since
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > last
>> > > > > > > > > > > > release.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Waiting for the one pending PR sound
>> reasonable.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely a +1 from my side.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lucas
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com> schrieb
>> am
>> > > > Mi., 18.
>> > > > > > > Sept.
>> > > > > > > > > > > 2024,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12:33:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Team,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I'd like to initiate a discussion about the
>> next
>> > > > release
>> > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > NiFi
>> > > > > > > > > > > > 1.x.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Since the release of Apache NiFi 1.27,
>> several
>> > > > important
>> > > > > > > bugs
>> > > > > > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > including
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> NIFI-13675 [2] have been resolved, and there
>> > have
>> > > > been a
>> > > > > > > > > handful
>> > > > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> features, improvements and dependency updates
>> > [3]
>> > > > added
>> > > > > > > to the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > nifi-1.x
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> branch.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Currently there is only one ticket waiting
>> for
>> > > > review,
>> > > > > > > all the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > others
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> merged,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> so it seems we are in a good position to kick
>> > off a
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > NiFi
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.28.0
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [4].
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I would be glad to handle the Release Manager
>> > > > > > > responsibilities
>> > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 1.28.0
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Do you agree it is time for a new release or
>> do
>> > you
>> > > > see
>> > > > > > > > > > additional
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we should make?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Ferenc Kis
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [1]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13742?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.28.0
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [2]
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13675
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [3]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13727?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.28.0%20AND%20type%20!%3D%20BUG
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [4]
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12354883
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to