+1 Tested (Linux)
- verify - files Gleb. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 10:22 AM, Sergey Kamov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > tested under win (JDK8) and mac (JDK8) > > -`maven clean verify` > > - examples tests > > - files > > Remark pom.xml scm tag <tag>0.6.0</tag> is incorrect. It should be > `v0.6.1` - please don't miss it next time. > > Paul. I have created additional ticket, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-77, so we with your help > we have 4 new tickers which can significantly improve and simplify test > procedure for next release. > > About current release, my opinion that these tests issues (for win) are > not critical and can be fixed in next release. > > Thank you, > > Sergey > > 09.06.2020 16:50, Paul King пишет: > > > I added the log for the first failing test to: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-76 > > The other tests look similar but let me know if you want them also. > > Cheers, Paul. > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:44 PM Sergey Kamov [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Hi Paul > > > Thank you for your remarks. > > > There are 3 kinds of problem > > > > > > 1. Some deserialization warnings > > > > > > > > Failed to unmarshal object with optimized marshaller > > > > > .. > > > > > I have created ticket - > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-75 > > > > > These warnings are not critical for our release I guess, but we have > > > > > to > > > > > fix it of course (warnings are always confused) > > > > > > 2. Problems with test, which ask data from some external weather data > > > provider (weather service test) > > > > > > > > 'ask' request 'tomorrow yesterday' answered > > > > > > > > > > > unsuccessfully with error: Unexpected response [code=420, > > > > > text=Unable to serve response within time limit, please enhance your > > > > > calm.] > > > > > > Sometimes this free external service doesn't work well. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-74 created. > > > I guess we can't depend on such external service in our suite, so these > > > tests should be refactored or excluded from suite. > > > It is not our release bug too, but better to fix it > > > > > > 3. Third error - most unexpected. > > > > > > > > !!! Failed 3 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!! > > > > > > org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41) > > > I have tested under win10, mac and linux - everything passed. I can't > > > reproduce it. > > > Could you provide, when you have time, whole log for 'mvn clean verify' > > > via new Jira issue or email? > > > Thank you > > > Sergey > > > > > > > I am +0 (on the basis that you aren't expecting the failures under > > > > Windows) > > > > but I'm happy to change to +1 if I am doing something wrong or if you > > > > believe it is something in my environment. I had no problems under > > > > Linux. > > > > I checked: > > > > > > > > - "incubating" in name > > > > - DISCLAIMER exists > > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good > > > > - no unexpected binary files > > > > - signature/hashes okay > > > > - rat check fails with no profile supplied but passes when given > > > > -Prelease > > > > (I assume that is okay?) > > > > (I'd suggest removing > > > > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding > > > > exclude > > > > for .yaml files) > > > > > > > > - "mvn clean package verify" passes on Linux under JDK11 > > > > (No appearance of Stanford or other GPL files with normal default > > > > profile) > > > > > > > > - "mvn clean verify" fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below) > > > > > > > > Windows Surefire Failure: > > > > [ERROR] Errors: > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153 » > > > > > TestFailed > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1 > > > > > !!! Failed 3 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!! > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41) > > > > > > > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly > > > > relevant > > > > or perhaps a red herring): > > > > [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized stream > > > > class > > > > > > > > > checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class present on all > > > > > nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class > > > > > scala.collection.immutable.Vector] > > > > > ... > > > > > [INFO] at > > > > > > org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryFieldAccessor.read(BinaryFieldAccessor.java:188) > > > > > > > > ~[apache-nlpcraft-incubating-0.6.1-all-deps.jar:0.6.1] > > > > > Jun.-09 18:20:58 [INFO ] 'ask' request 'tomorrow yesterday' answered > > > > > unsuccessfully with error: Unexpected response [code=420, text=Unable > > > > > to > > > > > serve response within time limit, please enhance your calm.] > > > > > ... > > > > > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object > > > > > [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet] > > > > > ... > > > > > [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to > > > > > deserialize object with given class loader: > > > > > [clsLdr=jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader@30946e09, > > > > > err=Failed to deserialize object > > > > > [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]] > > > > > ... > > > > > [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: > > > > > Failed > > > > > to unmarshal object with optimized marshaller > > > > > ... > > > > > [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: > > > > > Failed > > > > > to deserialize object > > > > > [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken] > > > > > Let me know if you need more complete stack traces or need a Jira > > > > > issue > > > > > created. While it seems like numerous errors, I expect they are all > > > > > related. > > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:21 AM Aaron Radzinski < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > NLPCraft-ers, > > > > > This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.1. This release > > > > > includes a > > > > > number of bug fixes, including the fix for pulling GPL-libraries > > > > > during > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > build. All 3-rd party dependencies now live in their own non-default > > > > > maven > > > > > > > > > profile. > > > > > Quick links: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Release location: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.6.1/ > > > > > > > > 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.1 > > > > > > > > > > 3. JIRA issues closed: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775 > > > > > > > > > > 4. KEYS file: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here: > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > > +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.1 > > > > > 0 - don't care either way > > > > > -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.1 (explain why) > > > > > See notes on how to verify release here: > > > > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > > The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 11, 2020 at > > > > > midnight MSK. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > ----------- > > > > > > > > > > Aaron Radzinski
